This is a well known mind bender and creates debates even among those who study the topic for a living, and it's a topic that far as i can tell put to bed, but I'm still looking for the conclusive source. Q goes like this and two basic versions:
The first goes like this (as depicted on the image above): “Imagine a 747 is sitting on a conveyor belt, as wide and long as a runway. The conveyor belt is designed to exactly match the speed of the wheels, moving in the opposite direction. Can the plane take off?”
Is that Q as written is not actually possible, it can't actually be answered as such; "The object will not stay motionless because we have unbalanced forces. So we can not design the conveyor belt to move at the same speed as wheels."
Hence, that Q is moot. The Q that makes more sense that most think of when they think of that Q, that is possible and does not ignore Newtonian physics is:
“An airplane cannot take off from a runway which is moving backward (like a treadmill) at a speed equal to its normal ground speed during takeoff“ - as shown in Mythbusters – is a different matter, and yes, the plane would fly.
Answers to both:
http://c-aviation.net/plane-conveyor...ined-debunked/
Bookmarks