|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Site Sponsor
Another reason I don't agree with the notion of SCOTUS infallibility. They upheld it at the time. They also upheld slavery at one time. So you'll excuse me if I don't put much stock into SCOTUS's modern-day opinion of the RKBA.Originally Posted by SteyrAUG
11C2P '83-'87
Airborne Infantry
F**k China!
Senior Member
Another for that list is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn
Site Sponsor
SCROTUS would still hold Dred Scott legal and binding if abolition hadn't been rammed up their craplocker by Constitutional amendment...
"You might be the law but that don't make you right."
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
Psalms 109:8, 43:1
LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.
Site Sponsor
Something can be legal but that doesn't necessarily make it right.
11C2P '83-'87
Airborne Infantry
F**k China!
Banned
And people can be endowed with liberty but that doesn’t mean they’re deserving of it unfortunately. Instead they just waste it
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by jpmuscle; 10-30-20 at 21:46.
Site Sponsor
Add Rehnquist to the drug addict list in this article.
https://reason.com/2005/07/01/supreme-court-senility-2/
Site Sponsor
Interestingly enough, even the nazis made sure everything they did had a legal basis starting with the Nuremberg laws up to the Wannsee conference where even when they established deniability they still took the time, trouble and effort to establish a legal foundation for everything they did.
So from a legal standpoint, that leaves the door wide open to just about anything.
It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.
Chuck, we miss ya man.
كافر
Site Sponsor
On the right/wrong not being the same as legal/illegal, Former prosecutor Wendy Murphy acts like she cannot understand voluntary vs. involuntary interactions. I don't know if she is faking it, so indoctrinated she doesn't know which way is up, or if It is a manifestation of a mental illness.
I have had conversations along these lines with people before with a similar outcome. An obvious one is someone being armed for self defense shouldn't be illegal gets met with "we don't let people commit arson/rape/theft/ad nauseum where party a inflicts harm on party b", but, and I have no doubt Wendy is the same, wants special groups like hers to be free to harm others without consequences for their actions.
Senior Member
That video, paired with my They Live glasses, made me angry and bitter.
That Karen named Wendy (obviously a lawyer)) says it’s illegal and morally wrong to rob someone.
Yet, don’t pay the tax man and who comes to your house with a gun?
They don’t want good looking whores legal because then people won’t be pissed off amd snap. Just like big pharma. I know what’s going on and Joe Rogan is a piece of shit who needs to be deported
Site Sponsor
She also goes on guilty until proven innocent and limits on presenting evidence of innocence. I hope someone is looking in to the cases she oversaw.
https://www.mindingthecampus.org/201..._the_sad_saga/
Based on the interview and articles I suspect she is among the loons who have the belief all heterosexual sex involves a man raping a woman
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks