Interesting- that they pulled it down, not what it finds...
https://justthenews.com/politics-pol...us-coronavirus
^^^ Johns Hopkins published then deleted an article questioning the U.S. coronavirus death rate
Probably didn't get Twitter's approval.
Pressured no doubt...
You won't outvote the corruption.
Sic Semper Tyrannis
It's fascinating that a major medical research university would pull what was almost certainly a peer-reviewed article that likely went through it's editorial approval process.
Or do they just yell "Hey Louie, slap that thing we got in da mail up on da website, will ya?"
The amount of junk science that has been “peer-reviewed” since March is mesmerizing. I’ve read so many articles published as “research” that I’d been laughed out of university for turning in. We’ve forgot what P values are and confidence intervals are and “we feel” has turned into the new standard.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Is peer-reviewed regarding Covid objective and intellectually honest, or is it akin to Global Warming agenda-driven 'consensus' bs?
Why would statistical analysis of numbers need to be “peer reviewed” and who would the peers be, medical or mathematical or statistical? If the number of deaths in 2019 equals the number of deaths in 2020, do I need to work at your fictional hospital to see they are the same?
Bookmarks