Yesterday, I got an email from GOA that stated Sleepy Joe is going after pistol-braced firearms via EO. Homemade guns were also in the crosshairs.
It was my understanding that it was an Executive Action that was signed, not an Executive Order.
Big difference.
An EO is legally binding, recorded in the Federal Register, and remains til another EO overturns it, the courts declare it conflicts with another law or Congress passes a law that supersedes it.
An Executive Action is none of these and isn’t even recorded. An EA doesn’t change any standing laws or give any agency new powers.
The bumpstock ban was an EO and even that’s being challenged in court, which could nullify it.
Thank you for clarifying that. You're absolutely correct. It was my mistake that I misinterpreted EA as the same thing as an EO.
Is this going to change at any point? The politicians aren't going to change on their own accord, regardless of who gets elected from the pool of people allowed to get to that stage. They have absolutely nothing to fear. At worst they're just going to get a nice private sector job offer if they end up losing an election.
Worse comes to worse, get a 16" barrel upper and a BCM/MFT buttstock and call it a draw.
Hang the SBA3 and 8" 9mm upper on the wall and talk about I can remember WHEN stories.
POW-MIA, #22untilnone
Let Us #NeverForget!
If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong.
The last thing I want to do is hurt you,
but it's still on my list.
DOUBLE POST
Last edited by RWH24; 04-19-21 at 07:58.
POW-MIA, #22untilnone
Let Us #NeverForget!
If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong.
The last thing I want to do is hurt you,
but it's still on my list.
Bookmarks