The French CAESAR gun is probably cheaper but the Swedish "Archer" system looks far more automated:
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/n...er-competition
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/n...nt-competition
The French CAESAR gun is probably cheaper but the Swedish "Archer" system looks far more automated:
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/n...er-competition
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/n...nt-competition
So this is the new form-factor for non/light armour guns? No one is actually going to tow guns? Counter battery fire just too fast to do it the old fashioned way?
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Depends who'll agree to Technology Transfer and license-building. Even when we licensed a British plane, the English Electric Canberra light bomber, we insisted that they enter a license-build arrangement with Martin for our B-57 copies.
If we don't get the whole TDP to build it from the wheels up here we won't buy it, and manufacturers are understandably VERY reluctant about giving enough info that somebody else could reverse engineer THEIR product and build unlicensed, or reverse-engineered and improved, copies.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
Psalms 109:8, 43:1
LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.
Yeah, and the FALs the Army tested had to be redesigned from square one even though the L1A1 and C1A1 were both already in Imperial measurements and off-the-shelf.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
Psalms 109:8, 43:1
LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.
Bookmarks