Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Remington Golden Saber .38 Special?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    320
    Feedback Score
    0

    Remington Golden Saber .38 Special?

    Doc,

    Any data/photography on this load? This is what my agency issues to those who carry issued revolvers and gives to those who carry personal BUGs and want to carry this load.

    I've personally switched to 148 wadcutters, but curious about this load's performance under your standard procedures.

    Did the old-school wet newspaper test several years back with G.S. in 2-, 4- and 5-in. barrels and expansion and penetration was about the same: bullets looked like magazine pictures and penetrated 12-14 inches fired from 3 yards.
    "The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not. " _ Thomas Jefferson

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    829
    Feedback Score
    0
    I carried it for a while when I was doing Security locally

    IIRC it performed real well in the FBI tests, proper expansion and penetration etc;
    Second Amendment Absolutist!

    "Speed costs money, How fast do you want to go?"
    -seen on a speed shop in Michigan

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Topeka, KS
    Posts
    1,583
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    I think it's an OK load, wound ballistics wise.

    I used to carry it in my 642 off-duty/BUG, quit doing so after I saw a fall off in QC at Remington.

    I had to use a mallet to get my gun open one time after the bullet pulled forward from the case while I was shooting a qual course. Bullet tied up the cylinder from rotating.
    That round had no crimp at all, and the Golden Saber is already a fairly long round as it's loaded from the factory.

    I have seen this several other times since in other 642s at our range.

    I'm now carrying the 135gr Gold Dot in one of my 642s, Cor Bon DPX in the other.

    I recommend the Gold Dot to everyone who asks me what I think the best snubby load is.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    oregon
    Posts
    7,126
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    how do we like the golden sabers in .45?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Topeka, KS
    Posts
    1,583
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    I used to carry it in my USP as a duty load, but I think there are better choices now, also note my comment on QC problems from Remington.


    Check here for duty ammo info;

    https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=19887

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    529
    Feedback Score
    0
    Overall the Golden Saber has never been that great of a performer. Often it is a marginal expander with excessive penetration and it has a good deal of core/jacket separation when punching through barriers. Not nearly as good as Ranger Talons, Federal HST, Gold Dots, or Federal Tactical Bonded.

    bkb0000,
    The .45acp in Golden Saber is very inconsistant and plugs easily. So, it usually has little or no expansion in FBI testing and penetrates very deeply. Better than FMJ though.

    Pick something from tpd223's link and you can be confident in your ammunition choice.

    As for .38spl from a short barrel. The best load currently on the market is the Speer Gold Dot 135gr+P.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •