What are your thoughts on this new trigger? It essentially uses a sear to release the hammer, even though it requires a single press for each function of the weapon.
What are your thoughts on this new trigger? It essentially uses a sear to release the hammer, even though it requires a single press for each function of the weapon.
A key part of the bumpstock ban was them arguing that each trigger pull was involuntary, vs. intentionally pulling it each time. Seems like this trigger is going to fall victim to the same logic.
I wouldn’t jump on that train.
Crystal ball says it’s illegal in 6 months.
A true "Gun Guy" (or gal) should have familiarity and a modicum of proficiency with most all firearms platforms.
IDK, everything I've seen on this trigger says you have to pull the trigger each time. All it's really doing is shortening the pull/release/pull distance. Finger moves less distance so it can move faster. But seems to require a deliberate pull. They'll probably try and ban it anyway though.
The trigger design is pure genius in execution and simplicity. While it's an expensive way to turn money into noise, it looks like a more elegant solution to binary style triggers and is far less money than buying a machinegun. I'd buy one if I had the money. Why? Because it looks fun. Yes, sometimes I shoot just for fun.
Last edited by MistWolf; 01-06-21 at 01:06.
The number of folks on my Full Of Shit list grows everyday
I am American
I think I can chew gum and walk at the same time.
BAD NEWS
A couple vids show guys running this trigger perfectly, for awhile. Then stoppages occur. They tinker with the buffer, spring, get another upper, etc.
But here a guy took apart one of these triggers and tells us why they all begin to fail. It is one tiny spring getting bent inside the trigger.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuEMhe_oWpo
Maybe a Mark 2 design will fix this.
Bookmarks