What method did he use to order it so?Originally Posted by PracticalRifleman
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Member
What method did he use to order it so?
What if this whole crusade's a charade?
And behind it all there's a price to be paid
For the blood which we dine
Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…
Moderator
Female killed was an Air Force veteran.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/capitol-h...reat-evacuated
In that youtube video, there were a group of armed tactical police that came up the stairs to meet with a few dark business suit wearing males right behind where that woman was shot. After a quick discussion, the tactical police and the business suit group left. They didn't interact with the crowd at all. A short time later was when the glass was broken and she tried to climb through and that's when she was shot. That's when they all came back. One even pointed his SBR through the broken opening but quickly drew it back. It would have been something if the people on the other side started shooting again when the SBR muzzle appeared through the opening. Blue on blue anybody?
Riots are like sports, it's better to watch it on TV at home.
Senior Member
How’s all that sand taste?
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/depar...ces-final-rule
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Site Sponsor
Wow. That was really bad....both sides.
I think "storm the capitol" is even a worse idea than "storm area 51." This isn't dramatically different from Occupy Seattle except for the fact that the police drew a definite line in the sand.
I don't think this helped anything.
It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.
Chuck, we miss ya man.
كافر
Senior Member
That's bad. There are cops all around. I didn't hear a warning. I wonder if it was a ND, because whoever shot had no situational awareness of what was actually happening. The cop with the AR near the wall almost engaged the shooter. What a shit show.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Banned
The optics only become negative when the GOP fail circle the wagons to capitalize on the rage and emotion.I've been out in the hills since 10am mountain time, and no radio or cell service. I come back to this and what a shit show. I am still trying to get up to speed, but after the Trump rally, who decided to go and bust up the Capitol Building? Was it ANTIFA/BLM infiltrators who led the way? I thought we wanted a full debate in Congress today to expose all the corruption in the election? All this chaos pretty well limited that it seems.
There was supposed to be a protest, and possible attacks by ANTIFA and BLM on the patriots who were in attendance - I didn't think vandalizing the US Capitol was part of the deal? We don't burn down a Wendy's in Atlanta or loot a shoe store in Minneapolis - these kinds of optics aren't shocking to me, but it will lose us support in a massive way. It was bound to happen in one way or another at some point:
They could have hailed this as the defining moments of a generation. When they and THE people fought back against democrats and corruption irrespective of the “violence”.
But they didn’t because they’re spineless cowards who’d rather grift billions from donors annually and simp to tech oligarchs all the while selling us out to the highest foreign interest.
Had BLM breached the White House over the summer and got a few of themselves shot and killed they’d have been martyred and the DNC would be singing hymns about them as national heroes.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by jpmuscle; 01-06-21 at 22:17.
Member
Serious question... If this shoot is ruled clean and justified, does that mean that from now one when "peaceful protesters" are smashing in doors and windows to one's home, that they can be shot? Would a skilled lawyer be able to use this in a case?
Senior Member
You mean the sand you’re spitting out because I caught you being duplicitous? That’s not Trump’s action. Trump’s action was to sign an Executive Memoranda.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ons/354536002/
What’s that?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ence/96979014/
So feel free to explain to me on one hand how Obama’s anti-gun EO’s have less teeth than Trump’s EM’s? And exactly how many people have been charged, much less convicted under Trump’s EM?
Otherwise you can gtfooh with your bull crap. No one is buying it!
What if this whole crusade's a charade?
And behind it all there's a price to be paid
For the blood which we dine
Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…
Site Sponsor
“A retired military officer told The Washington Times that the firm XRVision used its software to do facial recognition of protesters and matched two Philadelphia antifa members to two men inside the Senate.”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...ed-protesters/
Senior Member
Pretend all you want, but Trump reduces our rights. Or so you have a bumpstock you’re still using?You mean the sand you’re spitting out because I caught you being duplicitous? That’s not Trump’s action. Trump’s action was to sign an Executive Memoranda.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ons/354536002/
What’s that?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ence/96979014/
So feel free to explain to me on one hand how Obama’s anti-gun EO’s have less teeth than Trump’s EM’s? And exactly how many people have been charged, much less convicted under Trump’s EM?
Otherwise you can gtfooh with your bull crap. No one is buying it!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks