It was great to read this and it appears he was ready for this from the beginning. I think this was his goal from the start, he knew this was coming and had his defense in place before the product launched. I cant wait until it is shown the ATF did not do any form of examination like they claimed, and they're just arbitrarily making it up as they go. All this will be in front of courts and I wonder how many will pergure themselves, or will the ATF just drop it.
The FRT trigger is no more a machine gun than a bumpstock and we all know how that turned out. The owner may have covered his ass but what can you did when the goal post is forever being moved.
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/bi...a-machine-gun/
Gettin' down innagrass.
Let's Go Brandon!
I just kept reading “….does not meet the definition of a ‘machine gun’ as defined by federal law” and thinking to myself that the feds will just go in and try to change the legal definition of what constitutes a machine gun.
Perhaps. But he appears to have consulted with people that have had a hand in determining these things in the past, via their positions in the ATF. So, the ATF, by choosing to pursue this, may be choosing to accidentally call into question many past decisions. Essentially, they would be discrediting themselves, as an organization if they win. To win, they would have to admit they just make up the house rules for Monopoly as they go, changing them each game and each guest. Which is, of course, an accurate statement.
Something something sporter clause. Something something bumpstock traitors.
Again, not a lawyer, but this appears to me to be a cleverly laid trap, taking advantage of hubris.
Bookmarks