Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: NX-8 2.5-20 vs Mk5 3.6-18/5-25

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    261
    Feedback Score
    21 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by PracticalRifleman View Post
    Mine has the short turrets, not like the originals. My problems were holding zero and tracking. Not really mushy turrets.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    10-4, I had the tall M5B2 pinch turrets.
    Colt Armorer Course, 2004
    Remington Factory LE Armorer School (870, 1187, and 700), 2008, 2013
    Remington 870 LE Armorer course, 2017
    Specialized Armament M16 / M4 / AR-15® Advanced Armorer Course, 2012, 2016
    Glock Armorer Course, 2012, 2016
    S&W M&P 15 Armorer Course, 2013, 2019

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    4,618
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by PracticalRifleman View Post
    Multiple Mark 6 3-18s, a couple VX3s, and Mark 4s.

    ETA: the Mark 6 3-18 would be THE perfect feature set and weight if it has been reliable. I still own two of them, but my trust is low. One has been back to Leupold four times. The last time they were quite hateful and gave me the worst customer service I’ve ever had in a $3,000 scope.
    Own zero Leupolds right now. I've had three defective ones. They fixed the Mark 4, but grudgingly and added a shiny new dent to it while getting fixed. Two different VX-Rs had reticles so laughably misshapen they went straight back to the retailer. I've had decent Leupolds as well, but like you have no confidence in their product overall.

    I don't love Nightforce, mostly because the clarity and optical performance often seem "meh" for the price, but their quality control and ruggedness are outstanding. You pay for it, and you get it.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •