Originally Posted by
Mysteryman
I will say this again, for those who can read.
It appears the issue was some "genius" using and modifying the wrong holster. I am by no means a fan of SIG or the 320, but the data thus far doesn't point to this being a gun issue.
As for the 320. It's just another wannabe Glock. With a heavier SINGLE ACTION trigger(Glocks are double action) that has no pronounced reset and offers nothing in terms of reliability or durability over Glock. For those who've done the digging and reading, for the Army trials the SIG was failing much sooner than Glock in the hostile environment testing as well as the MRBF values. The Compact version of the 320 barely completed 1/3 of the required rounds for testing before the decision was made to award SIG the contract.... Oh yeah, the $120 MILLION dollar discount might have been a factor there.
Seeing as how the FBI proved through their trials/testing that the Glock was the better product. I suspect SIG was deeply worried that their chances of big green selecting a pistol that failed the FBI trials(which were practically hand picked for the 320 to win) was in jeopardy. Hence the drastic price cut. Add in SIG's willingness to hide the fact their pistols were unsafe(publicly sold copies, resulting in four lawsuits at the time) then pretend there was no issue, only to miraculously find a solution to the "non existent issue" only a couple days later, and offer that solution as a "voluntary upgrade". That all adds up to shady business practices and scumbags at the top.
Everything you said is correct and sad to hear.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
I believe in peace, love and extremely violent weapons systems... just in case that whole peace-and-love thing doesn't work out.
Bookmarks