Define sub-par tools. SOTAR has a crap-load more tools than most home assemblers, should every builder have the same guages and tools?
Anyway, the AR durability and reliability would look like this, assuming a reasonable amount of care is taken:
1. Quality parts and tools will have the highest likelihood of great function and part life.
2. Quality parts and sub-par tools would come in a close second. The allowable torque range on a barrel nut is huge, muzzle devices can use a crush washer, and a RE castle nut that is tight and staked should not cause any issues just because it is not torqued. Headspace may be out of spec, but quality parts reduces thay concern a bit. Any issues with assembly would show up relatively early in service life.
3. Subpar parts may be screened a bit with rigorous inspecting and measuring. Reliability will be better than long-term service life.
4. Sub-par parts installed with sub-par tools may have immediate reliability issues and long term service life will be poorer.
Building one sample of each and running them to failure really won't tell you much. Maybe you will have terrible luck and get that .01% bad part from a quality manufacturer and get perfect parts from a lower tier manufacture because the stars aligned.
All manufactures build perfect and sub-par parts. The quality manufacturers produce fewer sub-par parts and have test/inspection processes that ensure only a tiny fraction of those parts leave the factory.
Andy
Bookmarks