Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: The continued assault on conversatives

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma City
    Posts
    4,665
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    The DoD's definition of "extremism" is rather vague. I read it myself and it doesn't instill confidence it can't/won't be abused.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2021/0...remists-471291

    The Pentagon is launching an unprecedented campaign to root out extremists in the ranks after dozens of military veterans took part in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

    But confronting white nationalism and other far-right ideologies is proving to be a political minefield for an institution that prides itself on staying out of the nation’s partisan wars. There's a growing sense of anxiety within the Pentagon that this push could feed the perception that it is policing political thought, favoring one political party over another or muzzling free speech.

    The Pentagon has not yet disclosed all the training materials it is providing commanders, but that hasn't stopped lawmakers and right-wing commentators from accusing the Defense Department of initiating a witch hunt on behalf of the Biden administration to purge political opponents. While there is no evidence to support a politicization of this effort, there are concerns among the top brass and senior retired officers that it could backfire if the Pentagon doesn't clearly define exactly what "extremism" means.

    The day-long event is one in a series of steps the Pentagon has initiated in recent weeks to try to get a handle on the problem. The military, which has been accused of a "haphazard" approach to weeding out extremists, is also assessing the extent to which the problem has permeated the ranks, and has begun a series of reviews to determine if new training or regulations are needed to screen out extremist elements.
    Experience is a cruel teacher, gives the exam first and then the lesson.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The Free State of Nebraska
    Posts
    5,441
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Justice Amy Barrett is the next Sandra O'Conner.

    What were people expecting when you nominate a woman from chicago?
    "Not every thing on Earth requires an aftermarket upgrade." demigod/markm

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,286
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Something about getting onto the SCOTUS turns you soft in the head. You really got to be steel strong in your principles like a, Justice Thomas, or you wind up like a Roberts or worst. The power and prestige must just overwhelm the majority.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    North Alabama
    Posts
    5,311
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    Marxists fears the predominantly conservative and male military. The fix? Get rid of all the hetero white and conservative Latin, Asian, and African American male enlisted warriors (all extremists don't you know) and recruit gangsters from south of the border to replace them. Replace the officer corps with woke young adrogenous people.

    Sound right?

    Andy

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    33,984
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by TomMcC View Post
    Something about getting onto the SCOTUS turns you soft in the head. You really got to be steel strong in your principles like a, Justice Thomas, or you wind up like a Roberts or worst. The power and prestige must just overwhelm the majority.
    And lifetime appointments are supposed to prevent them from worrying about falling out of favor with the populace, but they still do it anyway. Nobody wants to be remembered as the "mean judge" who won't cave into whatever populist views are current.

    Of course SCOTUS was wrecked a long time ago, once they ruled Eminent Domain can be used for "private use" if the usage benefited the local population it was all over. It is the most flagrant, exactly OPPOSITE of what the Constitution stated SPECIFICALLY ruling that I can recall.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,286
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    And lifetime appointments are supposed to prevent them from worrying about falling out of favor with the populace, but they still do it anyway. Nobody wants to be remembered as the "mean judge" who won't cave into whatever populist views are current.

    Of course SCOTUS was wrecked a long time ago, once they ruled Eminent Domain can be used for "private use" if the usage benefited the local population it was all over. It is the most flagrant, exactly OPPOSITE of what the Constitution stated SPECIFICALLY ruling that I can recall.
    I would agree, ED is used to oppress the lesser fortune for the benefit of the wealthy...shameful.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Former USA
    Posts
    3,140
    Feedback Score
    0
    The extermination of conservative media, platforms, and personalities is just a precursor to the extermination of life. First they cancel your voice, your history, your livelihood, then they come for you...
    You won't outvote the corruption.
    Sic Semper Tyrannis

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    33,984
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by TomMcC View Post
    I would agree, ED is used to oppress the lesser fortune for the benefit of the wealthy...shameful.
    Yeah, they can do a land snatch of waterfront property owned by three generations if the promise the casino that will be built on it will bring valuable jobs to the community. It's exactly what the wording of the Constitution was intended to prevent. Once that one came down, I realized anything is possible. That was my big "wow, it really doesn't matter what anything says" wake up call.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •