Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: What's the history behind the moderator?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    1,777
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by utahjeepr View Post
    So the question I have is why does my 10.3 Crane spec barrel run fine without a moderator and without exhibiting the issues of the XM177. Not trying to be smart ass, but my upper isn't sprinkled with magic fairy dust. Physics haven't changed. What makes the difference? I usually run a can on it, but it runs without just fine. In fact I think .070 is a bit overgassed.
    A few things:

    1) A new extractor spring.

    2) A new magazine follower and spring.

    3) A heavier buffer.

    4) A new disconnect spring.

    5) New feed geometry



    And according to the reports, the 'moderator' was never intended to fix any reliability problems, it was in fact the source of several problems.

    Oh, and by the way, most civilian ARs are under-gassed. Point one straight down and fire it, most will not lock back, nor (I suspect) will most work properly in arctic temperatures.
    Last edited by lysander; 03-06-21 at 20:14.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    8,799
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by lysander View Post
    A few things:

    1) A new extractor spring.

    2) A new magazine follower and spring.

    3) A heavier buffer.

    4) A new disconnect spring.

    5) New feed geometry
    All of the above.
    The number of folks on my Full Of Shit list grows everyday

    http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n289/SgtSongDog/AR%20Carbine/DSC_0114.jpg
    I am American

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •