Originally Posted by
BoringGuy45
There's still the issue of eyebox and paralax at 1x. Even with training, the difference is noticeable, and you can't shoot at the weird angles you can with a RDS. Plus, LVPOs are 2 or 3 times the cost for the same bombproof quality as found in something like an Aimpoint PRO or even a T2.
But I agree: The day is coming when those cons of LVPOs will start to fade quite a bit. Technology is always marching forward.
Got my first firsthand look at the Razor Gen III 1-10x24 today. Surprisingly bright reticle that's actually useful at low magnification. Not as big nor bulky as it appears on the web. Seemed to have a quite forgiving eye box at the lower end too. Cost is high and the optic is not for the faint of wallet.
Anyway, this is probably the market leader in terms of size, weight, cost, brightness. There are some nice 1-6 and 1-8 LPVOs out there but few with a reticle that's probably as bright. And those that do are equal or more in price. Seems there's still some confusion with some makers who think shooters want a 6x that can be dialed down rather than a red dot that can be dialed up. But they're about to be forced to figure that out.
As other companies try to beat Vortex we should see some pretty nice scopes at better and better prices. Aimpoint isn't the only company likely to be left sucking hind tit. But at least EOTech understands that the market is changing and is working to respond with the Vudu scopes.
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."
Bookmarks