Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: LMT 308 receiver extension and A5 buffer

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    211
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)

    LMT 308 receiver extension and A5 buffer

    Is anyone running this setup? I picked up an LMT 308 receiver extension after reading that it was gtg with the A5 buffer setup. But there is a slight difference in length between the LMT and VLTOR RE-A5 tube. Will this cause any functioning issues?


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    3,516
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    It should not cause any issues.

    Always verify proper bolt catch over travel of ~1/4".
    Black River Tactical
    BRT OPTIMUM Hammer Forged Chrome Lined Barrels - 11.5", 12.5", 14.5", 16"
    BRT EZTUNE Preset Gas Tubes - PISTOL, CAR, MID, RIFLE
    BRT Bolt Carrier Groups M4A1, M16 CHROME
    BRT Covert Comps 5.56, 6X, 7.62

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    3,136
    Feedback Score
    50 (100%)
    That’s what I used, worked fine.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    565
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Clint View Post
    It should not cause any issues.

    Always verify proper bolt catch over travel of ~1/4".
    This, and press the BCG into the installed receiver extension to verify there's about 1/8" between the lower receiver and the rear of the gas key. Sort of the same check, but nice to have to points of reference.
    Nobody ever got shot climbing over the wall into East Berlin.

    Delivering the most precision possible, at the greatest distance possible, with the highest rate of fire possible.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,689
    Feedback Score
    41 (100%)
    I used this combo before. I didn’t measure anything, but it seemed to function just fine.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    4,634
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    The important measurement is the inside depth, not the outside length.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    211
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd.K View Post
    The important measurement is the inside depth, not the outside length.
    Yeah, the difference internal length is the same as the external.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    698
    Feedback Score
    49 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by AAMP84 View Post
    Yeah, the difference internal length is the same as the external.
    That was not the case from the tubes I had. Externally was shorter and internally was shorter as well.

    In a 5.56 build, when drawn all the way to the rear the travel for the BCG was significantly less. Could it run?...yes. Did it function the same as a BCM/Vltor buffer tube?...no.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    211
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by pointblank4445 View Post
    That was not the case from the tubes I had. Externally was shorter and internally was shorter as well.
    That’s what I meant, I just phrased it poorly. The internal length on the LMT is shorter by about the same amount as it is externally.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    698
    Feedback Score
    49 (100%)
    That might have been me...thought I read it as the internal is the same as the non-LMT tube.


    I have a big, long-winded post about it on P&S or lightfighter I think.

    Internal was 1/8" short; external was 1/16" +/- IIRC
    Last edited by pointblank4445; 04-04-21 at 15:25.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •