The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Because one of their lawyers intruded reality into the plans, and an EO ban of all guns and ammo in general would be illegitimate and wouldn't survive the first court challenge?
Or not. They care so little about rule of law for anything else, I don't see why it would stop them here. It could be purely a political calculation to stay at "boiled frog" and not move to "CW2." It could be that import duties on that stuff is too lucrative to give up the tax revenue. Dunno.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
I had to go confirm he actually said that verbatim, and yup, he did (1):
"From the very beginning that the Second Amendment existed, certain people weren’t allowed to have weapons."
Those were free slaves and native Americans. How'd that work out for them?
(1) https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-...ce-prevention/
Last edited by WillBrink; 04-13-21 at 08:34.
- Will
General Performance/Fitness Advice for all
www.BrinkZone.com
LE/Mil specific info:
https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/
“Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”
Bookmarks