Page 25 of 25 FirstFirst ... 15232425
Results 241 to 249 of 249

Thread: Uncle Joe Says he will go Executive Order On Guns....

  1. #241
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,434
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Straight Shooter View Post
    I wonder..and would love to hear any info or opinions...why Uncle didnt ban gun and/or ammo imports?
    THAT woulda hurt more than anything else he did. Thoughts?
    Because it actually would have hurt, even POs trying to buy ammo? That would mean no more Glocks for cops, right?
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  2. #242
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    4,618
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Straight Shooter View Post
    I wonder..and would love to hear any info or opinions...why Uncle didnt ban gun and/or ammo imports?
    THAT woulda hurt more than anything else he did. Thoughts?
    Because one of their lawyers intruded reality into the plans, and an EO ban of all guns and ammo in general would be illegitimate and wouldn't survive the first court challenge?

    Or not. They care so little about rule of law for anything else, I don't see why it would stop them here. It could be purely a political calculation to stay at "boiled frog" and not move to "CW2." It could be that import duties on that stuff is too lucrative to give up the tax revenue. Dunno.

  3. #243
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,434
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SomeOtherGuy View Post
    Because one of their lawyers intruded reality into the plans, and an EO ban of all guns and ammo in general would be illegitimate and wouldn't survive the first court challenge?

    Or not. They care so little about rule of law for anything else, I don't see why it would stop them here. It could be purely a political calculation to stay at "boiled frog" and not move to "CW2." It could be that import duties on that stuff is too lucrative to give up the tax revenue. Dunno.
    The president has pretty wide latitude on trade. Just look what Trump did to China. Maybe not ban, but he could put tariffs in place. That's my understanding at least.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  4. #244
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    suburbs of Philly Pa
    Posts
    6,189
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by FromMyColdDeadHand View Post
    Because it actually would have hurt, even POs trying to buy ammo? That would mean no more Glocks for cops, right?
    No. Like before you just add a clause for Police and military only! Or whatever.

    Also Glocks are made in US too!

    Sent from my moto z4 using Tapatalk
    Last edited by Arik; 04-12-21 at 14:09.

  5. #245
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    9,568
    Feedback Score
    45 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by FromMyColdDeadHand View Post
    Because it actually would have hurt, even POs trying to buy ammo? That would mean no more Glocks for cops, right?
    Glocks are made in the US these days.
    Gettin' down innagrass.
    Let's Go Brandon!

  6. #246
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,853
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by FromMyColdDeadHand View Post
    Because it actually would have hurt, even POs trying to buy ammo? That would mean no more Glocks for cops, right?
    .gov is exempt. Glock 25 and 28 were always listed as LE only for that reason.

  7. #247
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    9,568
    Feedback Score
    45 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by jsbhike View Post
    .gov is exempt. Glock 25 and 28 were always listed as LE only for that reason.
    And here we are with the G42, because 925(d)(3) makes so much sense.
    Gettin' down innagrass.
    Let's Go Brandon!

  8. #248
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    21,896
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    I had to go confirm he actually said that verbatim, and yup, he did (1):

    "From the very beginning that the Second Amendment existed, certain people weren’t allowed to have weapons."


    Those were free slaves and native Americans. How'd that work out for them?

    (1) https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-...ce-prevention/
    Last edited by WillBrink; 04-13-21 at 08:34.
    - Will

    General Performance/Fitness Advice for all

    www.BrinkZone.com

    LE/Mil specific info:

    https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/

    “Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”

  9. #249
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,853
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by WillBrink View Post
    I had to go confirm he actually said that verbatim, and yup, he did (1):

    "From the very beginning that the Second Amendment existed, certain people weren’t allowed to have weapons."


    Those were free slaves and native Americans. How'd that work out for them?

    (1) https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-...ce-prevention/
    Kinda narrows the viewpoint down.

Page 25 of 25 FirstFirst ... 15232425

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •