Chauvin Trial Commentary

[WillBrink]

Chief says he did not follow PD UOF policy:

[PracticalRifleman]

Chief says he did not follow PD UOF policy:

Sounds like some very creative answers to the questions presented. I found it especially telling when the chief states based on facial expression that it could not have been “light to moderate pressure”.

I’d like to know how the chief can scientifically determine how much pressure was applied to an enraged lunatic resisting arrest, high on opiates, by facial expression?

Evidently, the chief and prosecutor worked together to come up with questions and answers to say he wasn’t following policy even though it is consistent with policy.

Like I said, no fair trial. Chief is guilty of perjury.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[jsbhike]

You won’t answer the question. If you can’t answer the question posed, do t ask any.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I have answered it.

He deserves his day in court, he is getting that day in court, and his trial is at least as fair as a trial for anyone he arrested.

[WillBrink]

I have answered it.

He deserves his day in court, he is getting that day in court, and his trial is at least as fair as a trial for anyone he arrested.

How do you conclude that?

[jsbhike]

How do you conclude that?

Judge and prosecutor aren't ringers brought in after May so any people arrested by Chauvin could have been standing before them.

https://6abc.com/jerry-blackwell-att...-for/10456586/

Now if the criminal justice system in Minnesota is a cess pit of corruption that means Chauvin was arresting people fully knowing his actions were leading to a miscarriage of justice for others.

[PracticalRifleman]

How do you conclude that?

He has a “f the police” chip on his shoulder and cannot recognize things like media coverage, elected officials, etc can taint public opinion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[jsbhike]

He has a “f the police” chip on his shoulder and cannot recognize things like media coverage, elected officials, etc can taint public opinion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So if an incident is in the news a lot should the accused just be set free?

[LowSpeed_HighDrag]

Weird, I didn’t see in the post I quoted where you stated you didn’t know. Maybe you thought you put that in? Or you edited later?

The point remains...the tenth most violent city in Colorado aside, I’ve seen more force used in medical situations. Further, there was no soft-tissue injury evident on the autopsy. While I’m not hitching my wagon; as you say, but I’d think “excessive force” would result in at least some bruising.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Where in the world is any injury required to determine force, or excessive force? There is no injury if an officer wristlocks someone for being mouthy, there is no injury if an officer points his gun at someone who isn't a threat, there is no injury if an officer uses a chemical irritant on someone who didn't deserve it.

Find me one cop who says they would keep their knee on someone's neck for 9 minutes, and I'll show you the bad cop we all talk about.

[jsbhike]

You don’t support a fair trial. You’ve expressed that. **** off.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If it's the same judge and so on that was good enough for everyone else, then why is it bad now?

Is a bench trial possible?

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile...not-by-juries/

[PracticalRifleman]

Where in the world is any injury required to determine force, or excessive force? There is no injury if an officer wristlocks someone for being mouthy, there is no injury if an officer points his gun at someone who isn't a threat, there is no injury if an officer uses a chemical irritant on someone who didn't deserve it.

Find me one cop who says they would keep their knee on someone's neck for 9 minutes, and I'll show you the bad cop we all talk about.

Now you’re in the realm of “deserved it” I see.

Holding a person who resisted arrest and was not cooperative, who had just destroyed evidence is not comparable to pointing a firearm at a “non-threat”.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk