Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 64

Thread: Matt Gaetz

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    2,767
    Feedback Score
    0
    Rep leadership should look into it. If he did illegal or otherwise dirty shit bounce his ass.

    Of course Creepy Killer Coumo and Spy Lovin' Swalwell will get total makeovers by their sycophants in the press.
    Go Ukraine! Piss on the Russian dead.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    15,415
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    He's openly fighting it, honestly if they've got the truth, why does the FBI have to leak the story?
    No, the FBI will call CNN and tell them when they are going to arrest you tonight and then they'll confront your wife with the story on your front lawn in front of the neighbors.
    You know there is a hell of a lot more swamp that still needs draining.
    The guy tried to extort Gaetz and his Dad wore a wire to expose it, what more can you do?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,453
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Averageman View Post
    He's openly fighting it, honestly if they've got the truth, why does the FBI have to leak the story?
    No, the FBI will call CNN and tell them when they are going to arrest you tonight and then they'll confront your wife with the story on your front lawn in front of the neighbors.
    You know there is a hell of a lot more swamp that still needs draining.
    The guy tried to extort Gaetz and his Dad wore a wire to expose it, what more can you do?
    You forgot they'll do it at 2 in the morning with full lights/sirens/choppers, kill your dog, and drag her and the kids out into the street in their undies while they do it to further amplify the humiliation.

    The swamp doesn't need draining, it needs to be nuked into glass.
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    Ye best start believin' in Orwellian Dystopias, mateys... yer LIVIN' in one!--after Capt. Hector Barbossa
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Deep South Texas
    Posts
    4,037
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Probably has a lot to do with it...quick clip of him calling out the admin on the border bs.

    https://mobile.twitter.com/mamabear_...41556617457665
    "You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass."
    Japanese Admiral Yamamoto, 1941




    "A wise man's heart directs him toward the right, but a foolish man's heart directs him toward the left."
    Ecclesiastes 10:2:

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,630
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Watch the interview with Tucker Carlson. Tuck asks the question, How long have you known you were under investigation? Matt doesn't answer, but immediately starts talking about how all this has affected his family.

    The investigation began last fall, when Bill Barr was AG. It's inconceivable that the AG would not have known about the investigation of a Congressman, and allowed it to go forward. I'm thinking Gaetz has known for months that he's being looked at, and doesn't want to admit that on national television. That would belie his extortion story, would it not?

    Meanwhile, attorney McGee says he hopes there are tapes, and let's play them and see who's telling the truth. Says he has no connection with the case. One question then is, how did Matt focus on McGee? Did he just pick him out of the phone book? What IS McGee's connection, if any?

    Tucker sure stayed clear of any endorsement of Gaetz's conspiracy theory. Can't blame old Tuck for being suddenly fact-oriented, when other conservative talkers are being sued for billions by voting machine companies.

    Occam's Razor: The simplest explanation is the preferred one. So:

    Is the simpler explanation that there's a deep state conspiracy to obtain payback on Gaetz and chill conservatives, fomented by various DOJ people, with at least the knowledge and tacit approval of Trump ally Bill Barr, and fronted by a criminal defense lawyer who's been out of the DOJ for many years, and goes rogue (?) and tries to extort a Congressman for $25 million, and doesn't make any particular effort to hide his identity . . . . OR . . . does Matt like them "on the younger side?"


    Stay tuned on this one.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,630
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Edit to delete duplicate post,
    Last edited by Uni-Vibe; 03-31-21 at 21:09.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,286
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Uni-Vibe View Post
    Watch the interview with Tucker Carlson. Tuck asks the question, How long have you known you were under investigation? Matt doesn't answer, but immediately starts talking about how all this has affected his family.

    The investigation began last fall, when Bill Barr was AG. It's inconceivable that the AG would not have known about the investigation of a Congressman, and allowed it to go forward. I'm thinking Gaetz has known for months that he's being looked at, and doesn't want to admit that on national television. That would belie his extortion story, would it not?

    Meanwhile, attorney McGee says he hopes there are tapes, and let's play them and see who's telling the truth. Says he has no connection with the case. One question then is, how did Matt focus on McGee? Did he just pick him out of the phone book? What IS McGee's connection, if any?

    Tucker sure stayed clear of any endorsement of Gaetz's conspiracy theory. Can't blame old Tuck for being suddenly fact-oriented, when other conservative talkers are being sued for billions by voting machine companies.

    Occam's Razor: The simplest explanation is the preferred one. So:

    Is the simpler explanation that there's a deep state conspiracy to obtain payback on Gaetz and chill conservatives, fomented by various DOJ people, with at least the knowledge and tacit approval of Trump ally Bill Barr, and fronted by a criminal defense lawyer who's been out of the DOJ for many years, and goes rogue (?) and tries to extort a Congressman for $25 million, and doesn't make any particular effort to hide his identity . . . . OR . . . does Matt like them "on the younger side?"


    Stay tuned on this one.
    IDK, was it simpler to believe that Trump wasn't a Putin stooge, really loving his country or that Hilliary, Comey, the DNC and a whole host of other D-bags were conspiring to take him down?

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,286
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    deleted...double post probs again.
    Last edited by TomMcC; 04-01-21 at 00:27.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    9,563
    Feedback Score
    45 (100%)
    Simple, produce the evidence and arrest his ass or STFU.
    Gettin' down innagrass.
    Let's Go Brandon!

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,420
    Feedback Score
    0
    How long would it take to investigate something like that?

    My guess is that it was a staffer or intern that he/campaign covered travel expenses. 17 for an intern seems young, but not out of the possible.

    The Barr angle I really don't care for, makes me think it is even more fake. Like Barr would have anything to do with it, and even if it stank to high heaven, Barr would get blamed for protecting one of Trump's main guys. That there are DOJ/FBI guys looking to head-hunt Trump people- that doesn't take much to believe. Frankly it was the DOJ/FBI modus for the past 5 years.

    The story seems just too odd to believe. But self-destructive, narcissistic a-hole pol? Sure that can happen.

    Seems like you'd be able to clear this up pretty fast. The longer the FBI stays quiet, the better the chances it is all BS.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •