https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/14/polit...etz/index.html
CNN has really hit bottom with this. So, this guy pleads a deal and it means that Gaetz has to be guilty of everything and more.
Joel Greenberg, a former Seminole County, Florida, tax commissioner, had faced decades in prison
repeatedly taking advantage of his public office's power and financial coffers
Now, I know taxes are a bitch, but taking advantage of his tax commisioner status to hold sway over young women and underaged women, who don't even pay taxes. Little known fact, JFK pulled some pretty good tail as POTUS, but nothing like when he was a tax man in Boston...
The Greenberg plea documents released Friday paint the picture of a man gone wild -- using popular cellphone apps to make contacts, paying thousands of dollars for sex with younger women, having drug-laced, multi-person rendezvous at hotels like an Embassy Suites,
I don't know what is sadder, that the CNN reporter thinks just because it includes 'Suites' in the name that EMbassy Suites are high falutin', or that they think that people will think it was excessive. Nothing picks up young chicks like an offer of a free continental breakfast in the morning...
And then buried in the article:
Gaetz has not been charged and denies any wrongdoing. The congressman isn't mentioned in the 86 pages of plea deal documents released on Friday.
And then some projection:
Gaetz's pattern of false statements and accusations could be used to undermine his credibility as a witness in any case where he is called to testify.
I think they mean Greenberg because of some political sleaze that he played against a political enemy.
Greenberg sounds like a total douche, and the less time he spends in prison is a gift to him. Gaetz seems like a he is a young tool. Supposedly he is l-o-d-i-d rich, so why not.
Fun to see where all this goes, which is probably no-where.
Last edited by FromMyColdDeadHand; 05-14-21 at 18:26.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Bookmarks