Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Heavier bullet but no data? (.25 acp)

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,078
    Feedback Score
    0

    Heavier bullet but no data? (.25 acp)

    My Hi-Skor 700X seems an appropriate powder for .25 acp.

    Hodgdon recommends 1.0 to 1.1 grs using a 50 gr FMJ bullet.

    Well, what about the 55 gr FN-TC lead bullets I have?

    I'm thinking I can still start at 1.0 grs.

    I know, I need to start an account at a forum specific to reloading, but I'd like to improve our knowledge base over here. For all the people coming to M4carbine for .25 and .32 reload data...
    Last edited by Ron3; 04-21-21 at 06:17.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    2,345
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron3 View Post
    I'm thinking I can still start at 1.0 grs.
    Agreed... That's Hodgdon's starting load, right?

    I mean, you might try 0.9gr, but if your powder thrower is like mine, then it's ±0.1gr, anyway.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,630
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    I'd start at 1.0 grain. If you have a powder trickler, use it to make some test loads.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Inland Northwest
    Posts
    1,356
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    1.0 grain should be fine. Remember that the lead bullets require less force to engrave upon the rifling than jacketed, so increased pressure shouldn't be a problem.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,078
    Feedback Score
    0
    I made 18 rounds with 1.0 gr.

    Yes that's the starting load for a 50 gr fmj.

    The first few had shorter OAL than I'd set up for some reason. Minimum with 50 gr bullet is .900 IIRC. I wanted 9.15. I ended up with one at .875 (pulled that one), .895, .900, and the rest are .910 to .915.

    I separated the .895 load from the others and will fire it if the others arent hot.

    With these truncated bullets they are just a little long for the chamber and touch the rifling enough to stick past .910.

    So that's really my target OAL if the pressure/velocity is reasonable.

    I'm going to fire the first batch from a Beretta M950 because some parts, especially a slide, are more available than M21A parts. (In .25)

    Thanks for the advice.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,078
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have a beam scale and trickler. I found the Lee .17 cc dipper that came with the die set to be pretty accurate. I weighed every charge and checked OAL on each.

    Cci SPP and PPU cases.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,078
    Feedback Score
    0
    Well, not great. Fired from a Beretta M21A .25.

    First shot was read 838 fps. Misread? I dunno. Next highest was 773 fps.

    But for 10 shots, including the two above:

    H. 838
    L. 681
    Avg. 735
    ES. 157 (Throwing out the 838 fps reading would lower this to 92)

    The one load that was shorter than the others at .895 OAL gave an average reading. So to me this means I can load them all to what fits best in the chamber which is .900.

    Surprisingly I had no feeding issues or stoppages of any kind even with my wild ES and truncated, lead bullets. Accuracy was excellent! Good pistol.

    Some PPU fired the same day (80 degress) gave me this for 5 shots:
    H. 770
    L. 744
    Avg. 760
    ES. 26

    I'm not sure if I should continue with 700x in this .25 or try CFE Pistol. perhaps the larger range of powder (1.1-1.3) would mean less variation?

    I'm also not sure if the variation in velocity was powder differences or the fact that my OAL's varied a bit. (.895-.915) (but seemed to settle down as I loaded)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Inland Northwest
    Posts
    1,356
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Reloading is all about eliminating variables. Try another group with all the rounds as consistent as possible (to include OAL) and see what kind of readings you get. Then start experimenting with charge weight. Also, don't try and address more than one variable at a time.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    2,345
    Feedback Score
    0
    +1 Eliminate variables.

    Use the same OAL and change the powder charge, or vice versa.

    On such a small cartridge, a 0.020" difference in OAL is a BFD.

    Otherwise, it seems like you're right in the ballpark, velocity wise (it's just that your loads are inconsistent).

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,078
    Feedback Score
    0
    Ok. Thanks.

    I'll make another batch and focus on getting the OAL right. Same powder charge.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •