Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 68

Thread: Sweden and Finland to jointly adopt new service rifle

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Posts
    41
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    Yeah...kinda. Maybe one day WE will be able to get a 416.
    May be. If during this time nothing more modern and convenient to use will be developed. Now, after all, all industries are developing, although sometimes it seems that the arms sector has slightly slowed down in the direction of technological progress, the development of electronics and space technologies.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Not in a gun friendly state
    Posts
    3,807
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    Yeah...kinda. Maybe one day WE will be able to get a 416.
    Well, since the M27 is now the Marines' service rifle, and this NGSW is likely going to go the way of the OICW, the XM8, and the Land Warrior, I'd imagine the Army is NOT going to sit back and let the Marines be the one with the new, cool rifle. My guess is that they'll adopt a 416 variant service wide at some point, which would be great because that will probably mean that 416 will have to give up some patents. Just speculation.
    Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who do not.-Ben Franklin

    there’s some good in this world, Mr. Frodo. And it’s worth fighting for.-Samwise Gamgee

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,029
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by BoringGuy45 View Post
    Well, since the M27 is now the Marines' service rifle, and this NGSW is likely going to go the way of the OICW, the XM8, and the Land Warrior, I'd imagine the Army is NOT going to sit back and let the Marines be the one with the new, cool rifle. My guess is that they'll adopt a 416 variant service wide at some point, which would be great because that will probably mean that 416 will have to give up some patents. Just speculation.
    I meant "we" the citizens of the US, and I mean something truer to the 416 than the MR556. I think our military is doing fine with the current M4 platform. Special dudes already have 416s and "gotta be different" branches already have their "other than M4" rifle. Marines ran the M16A4 for a long damn time so they probably earned their M27.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    13,549
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    I like my MR556. Quite a bit. I don’t know why people want the 2005 416 when the current year ones are so much better. I would love it if they would release the more current version but the one available is the M27 with no select fire.


    The G95 would be dope


    Especially a really well configured MR762.

    I love mine.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Not in a gun friendly state
    Posts
    3,807
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    I meant "we" the citizens of the US, and I mean something truer to the 416 than the MR556. I think our military is doing fine with the current M4 platform. Special dudes already have 416s and "gotta be different" branches already have their "other than M4" rifle. Marines ran the M16A4 for a long damn time so they probably earned their M27.
    I know that's what you meant by "we". That's what I meant as well; that's why I was talking about HK having to give up patents if the Army were to adopt a 416 variant; we'd likely see multiple quality companies like BCM, DD, etc. making 416 rifles and parts, and thus more affordable options than HK on the civilian market.
    Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who do not.-Ben Franklin

    there’s some good in this world, Mr. Frodo. And it’s worth fighting for.-Samwise Gamgee

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,029
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Firefly View Post
    I like my MR556. Quite a bit. I don’t know why people want the 2005 416 when the current year ones are so much better. I would love it if they would release the more current version but the one available is the M27 with no select fire.


    The G95 would be dope


    Especially a really well configured MR762.

    I love mine.
    I don't know which gen 416 I shot but I shot a few, then I got a MR556 and it wasn't even close to the same. It's like ordering a Colt 6945 but getting one with a HBar barrel.

    At least the USC was able to be converted to an acceptable UMP so I shouldn't complain.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,863
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BoringGuy45 View Post
    ... we'd likely see multiple quality companies like BCM, DD, etc. making 416 rifles and parts, and thus more affordable options than HK on the civilian market.
    That is a good idea.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,029
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Hey, I just noticed they went to a Pmag thing. WTF? All that talk about the ultimate maritime magazine, where did it go? That was 10% of the appeal of the rifle.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Posts
    6,948
    Feedback Score
    23 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    I meant "we" the citizens of the US, and I mean something truer to the 416 than the MR556. I think our military is doing fine with the current M4 platform. Special dudes already have 416s and "gotta be different" branches already have their "other than M4" rifle. Marines ran the M16A4 for a long damn time so they probably earned their M27.
    For the first time in, well, forever, the Marines aren't getting sloppy seconds from the army. It only took 200+ years.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Former USA
    Posts
    3,141
    Feedback Score
    0
    What specifically does the M27 do better than a M4?
    You won't outvote the corruption.
    Sic Semper Tyrannis

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •