Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 55

Thread: ATF proposed rule change. Time to comment. UPDATE in OP.

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    506
    Feedback Score
    0
    I just read and tried to comment and the document number appears to be buried in the ecomments page because I could not find it to submit a comment digitally.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Black Hills, South Dakota
    Posts
    4,687
    Feedback Score
    0
    I’m sure that is intentional on BATF’s part.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,585
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    My comments to this are all loaded up in 30 round mags.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    East Coast
    Posts
    918
    Feedback Score
    0
    But at least that orange rude guy who tweeted too much is gone, right? Right???

    Elections have consequences and we’re seeing that full frontal right now. The ATF needs to disbanded and Congress needs to exert the fact that only they can make law.

    Oh and is the worthless NRA fundraising off this yet??


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    13,549
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by tgizzard View Post
    But at least that orange rude guy who tweeted too much is gone, right? Right???

    Elections have consequences and we’re seeing that full frontal right now. The ATF needs to disbanded and Congress needs to exert the fact that only they can make law.

    Oh and is the worthless NRA fundraising off this yet??


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    I hate to say it but we could actually use the NRA now to injunction spam them and run interference.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    2,156
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Firefly View Post
    I hate to say it but we could actually use the NRA now to injunction spam them and run interference.
    Well someone get Wayne to roll out of his fancy hotel bed, wipe the coke off his nose and chuck that Czech hooker he killed just to watch the lights go out in her eyes into a dumpster, and get his ass to work.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,663
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tgizzard View Post
    But at least that orange rude guy who tweeted too much is gone, right? Right???

    Elections have consequences and we’re seeing that full frontal right now. The ATF needs to disbanded and Congress needs to exert the fact that only they can make law.

    Oh and is the worthless NRA fundraising off this yet??
    Did Congress pass legislation with specific language addressing so-called 80% receivers, or it is an ATF dreamed up interpretation from years past?
    Last edited by ChattanoogaPhil; 05-08-21 at 16:05.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,234
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Biggy View Post
    Am I reading the proposal correctly that all PMFs have to be serialized? Yet only licensed manufacturers can serialize firearms? So I’d have to be a Type 07 FFL or Class 02 SOT to make my own firearm?
    LOL. This rule making proposal is racist… it financially seeks to restrict who can make their own firearms and this will mostly impact minorities.
    My 1st pass reading was only if an FFL acquires it. Private individuals do not need to put SNs are firearms, that admit that in the doc.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,234
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ChattanoogaPhil View Post
    Did Congress pass legislation with specific language addressing so-called 80% receivers, or it is an ATF dreamed up interpretation from years past?
    No.

    Nor did Congress give anyone the power to determine when 5 lbs of mined Bauxite becomes a firearm.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,013
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ChattanoogaPhil View Post
    Did Congress pass legislation with specific language addressing so-called 80% receivers, or it is an ATF dreamed up interpretation from years past?
    LOL. Legislation. "ATF has determined..." or didn't you know about how the sporter clause and determination letters work.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •