Originally Posted by
OH58D
As you know, Colorado is a lot like New Mexico - lots of wide open country and rural people who do what they want. You go to the San Luis Valley and Alamosa, or even in La Plata and Montezuma Counties outside of Durango and Cortez, and you will still see Trump signs on the fences. Nobody complies with anything out in rural New Mexico, and I get the feeling in rural Colorado as well.
If you're ever in this part of the State on I-25 hang a left at Wagon Mound and head east on NM 120. I'm past the Canadian River a piece, then 16 miles off of pavement. Otherwise we could meet in Las Vegas, where the wife works.
I halfway think that’s why they’re doing this local preemption law. If they went for a state wide ban they know that it would not be enforced in a large part of the state. The mag band they put in place is a joke. The local laws will be a joke to, for the punchline is you go to jail forever if you get caught.
My son starts ground school this summer for his private pilots license. Will probably need some mid length strips once he gets his license. Will have to stop on by sometime.
Originally Posted by
Quiet
Basic summary...
1. CA assault weapons laws were ruled to be unconstitutional.
2. A 30 day stay was issued with the ruling.
During that 30 day window, CA DOJ can appeal the ruling to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
If CA DOJ does appeal, then the stay remains in place until the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals makes a ruling, which can take 2-5 years.
If CA DOJ does not appeal, then after the 30 day stay is up, CA assault weapons laws will no longer be legal.
^This is when it will be legal to no longer abide by CA assault weapons laws.
~The 30 day window ends on July 4.
This judge also put in a magazine injunction and ruling, how did that all shake out? What was the timeframe on that one? If I remember it went to a three judge panel and then en Blanc. It’s either another brick in the wall or a brick out of the wall depending on how you want to use the model. This kind of stuff encourages me more than the passing of state laws like Texas constitutional carry. We need to sanctify magazine fed semi automatic firearms and 30 round magazines through a clear and concise Scotus decision.
Trying to fix societal problems through legislation controlling physical things like plastic boxes has never worked. Especially when they are aimed at lol biting people.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Bookmarks