Them’s fighting words! 1984 was awesome. I wore that tape out on my Walkman over a summer in 1989.Originally Posted by utahjeepr
Obviously the best was Van Halen II. But my personal was 1984
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Member
Them’s fighting words! 1984 was awesome. I wore that tape out on my Walkman over a summer in 1989.
Obviously the best was Van Halen II. But my personal was 1984
Senior Member
Who you got on lead guitar? Alex Lifeson's unemployed at the moment...
- Either you're part of the problem or you're part of the solution or you're just part of the landscape - Sam (Robert DeNiro) in, "Ronin" -
Site Sponsor
1984 rocked the casbah. Walk on with that noise.
It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.
Chuck, we miss ya man.
كافر
Site Sponsor
Yeah, yeah. I guess I hold a grudge against 1984. I really didn't like Jump. Some of the other tracks rocked. I just kinda unfairly group it with tha Van Hagar albums.
The first 5 LPs were something else. Hell, I even like WCF and DD better than 84. Probably just me.
Go Ukraine! Piss on the Russian dead.
Senior Member
Did people start drinking early tonight?
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Site Sponsor
Jump and Panama were the ones I wore out the hardest. VH died with Hagar. That "I can't drive 55" nonsense was what I hated.
It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.
Chuck, we miss ya man.
كافر
Senior Member
?? I can't drive 55 was Hagar pre-VH by quite a few years. I like Hagar as Hagar.. but not VanHagar.
Member
Anything “VanHagar” is tolerable compared to Gary Charone and VH5 era. Oh what a travesty!
Moderator
ok boys, back on track
GET IN YOUR BUBBLE!
Senior Member
This ruling has to be driving the left nuts. It reads very plainly, and is easily understandable. I’m about 20 pages in, where it cover scrutiny level, and from what I understand, that is crux of the legal fight. Strict scrutiny gets us what we want, intermediate scrutiny lets the govt dictate what rights we get left with. From what I understand, some members are said outright that lower courts are incorrectly applying intermediate scrutiny as a way to effectively ignore Heller and McDonald.
Maryland (?) is the case that I seem to remember intermediate scrutiny being the issue?
We need this case to go to the 9th, hopefully get a good pull of judges for a 3-0 or 2-1 decision, just to make it look more legit. It will go en blanc and get denied, but it sets up chance for SCOTUS to take it and at the very least set the scrutiny level correctly- and hopefully even more explicitly not just strike down the current bans, but codify the right.
If they just strike down the current bans, we’ll end up with $100 yearly registrations and all kinds of other BS.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks