To give you a totally honest answer I would say a qualified “yes” with a few caveats. Of all the piston ARs in the world, the HK is definitely the standard and with the 16” barrel you do get a far less violent recoil impulse than you would if you had a 10.4 or an 11”. That said, there is no such thing as a free lunch. The rifle is designed to survive a long time in adverse conditions but the carbon still collects somewhere. You do have to maintain it. That said, it is a bit more proprietary than your average AR.
You don’t have to baby it (I don’t baby mine) but if you are on the fence then maybe it’s not the gun for you. You will hear a lot of larpy hogwash poopooing of the 556 that should be absolutely and immediately dismissed. It IS in its own ecosystem of sorts. If all else were equal and perfect, should the rifle ever hiccup; HK will certainly stand by their product and I can attest and affirm to this professionally and personally.
BUT Cali is weird and you may only have so much of a window. I only discuss the 556 because I own one and you asked about it.
If it were me I would probably get a quality 6920 style carbine and a lot of spare parts from gas tubes to BCGs. I might even look into something with a rifle gas. You may be in a position due to political climate where you may have to be your own armorer. So you may want a lot more common parts.
If you did opt for the 556, you should be totally fine. But if you are anxious about the longevity of your freedom you may want something not so proprietary.
Going a step further, were money not an issue I would get an LMT Rifle and a spare, standard carbine upper.
All I can say is good luck. If nothing else, get what you can get regardless
Bookmarks