ATF has posted their proposed brace rules.

[P2Vaircrewman]

It ain't over until the fat lady sings.

https://www.captainsjournal.com/2021...-stock-ruling/

[202]

This. Somebody needs to get a hold of Hinson in Iowa and tell her that her RIFLE Act is just feelgood until she strikes at Sporter Clause or NFA34.
https://bearingarms.com/john-petroli...a-taxes-n46971

As a bonus, RIFLE doesn't do jack about the registration requirement, just wipes out the taxes which can ALWAYS be reinstated later.

I agree.
She should label the tax as rascism, explaining that minorities cannot afford to pay it, and you’ll see how fast it disappears.
Let’s play the left game.

[Diamondback]

I agree.
She should label the tax as rascism, explaining that minorities cannot afford to pay it, and you’ll see how fast it disappears.
Let’s play the left game.

Problem is, if we spike the tax then "mandatory registration is no big deal, not like it costs you anything..."

[202]

Problem is, if we spike the tax then "mandatory registration is no big deal, not like it costs you anything..."

Yeah. True.

[SteyrAUG]

Problem is, if we spike the tax then "mandatory registration is no big deal, not like it costs you anything..."

Properly ID mandatory registration as a civil rights violation. No game needed.

[Core781]

Any bans related to arms, ammo, mags, features etc. is unconstitutional. Including bumpstocks. The pistol brace nonsense has already been contested by conservative leadership and will undoubtedly be found a violation of Article VI. The collective intelligence has caught up with the hypocrisy, and its common knowledge that any government cannot seize property of lawful citizens, regulate arms, and ban arms related components, as it violates Western Law's fundamental frameworks. It also violates the Second Amendment which at all levels of government, they may not regulate any arms, and said arms are protected by Article VI. By violating Article VI (Supreme Law) government is in violation of the US Constitution itself. This writes "The People" a blank check to dismantle, defund, and discharge those behind these unlawful regulations. Including censure, and charging them with high crimes and disbarring those in the Judicial Branch.

[09fatbob]

So adding an lpvo essentially makes an sbr according to this points system… what a joke

So what’s the prize for getting the highest score?

10 years and or 10000.00 $ fine i assume

[202]

Anything new about this crap?

https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/...lizing-braces/

Has anyone figured out the points system BS?

[flenna]

Anything new about this crap?

https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/...lizing-braces/

Has anyone figured out the points system BS?

The point system is irrelevant since they added a clause that basically says "if we want to say it's an SBR, then it's an SBR. 10 years/$10,000 for you!" .

[Core781]

This is an unconstitutional trend with the ATF and their overlords. The new proposed firearms definition changes is more unconstitutional garbage that allows "the director" to define arms and components at will. This is the most blatant violation of Western Law and spits on Article VI and the Second Amendment. I cannot express how treasonous it is to allow anyone in the DOJ this kind of power. Every US citizen should be mad as hell that ANY leadership would allow this. The ATF has been the right hand for tyrants in our leadership for far too long. The DOJ by and large is facilitating these abuses of power.