Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 52

Thread: Facebook news or not?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    223
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)

    Facebook news or not?

    Facebook can't be up held to the same standards as the news because it's not news according to lawmaker's.

    This week the Whitehouse wants to block a list of individuals on Facebook because it's drowning out real Covid 19 news.

    So is it news or not? Seems like the Dems think so. Sometimes I can't even believe they make it this obvious and people still miss how hypocritical the politicians are. "It's good for you but not for me". 401k anyone!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    539
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Twilk73 View Post
    Facebook can't be up held to the same standards as the news because it's not news according to lawmaker's.

    This week the Whitehouse wants to block a list of individuals on Facebook because it's drowning out real Covid 19 news.

    So is it news or not? Seems like the Dems think so. Sometimes I can't even believe they make it this obvious and people still miss how hypocritical the politicians are. "It's good for you but not for me". 401k anyone!
    I have also thought that if Facebook is used for anything more than entertainment, than you are seriously mislead. It’s like watching jimmy kimmel or Cobert and thinking that that’s the opinion of the majority of people. I mean they filter what they want to put out and won’t let opposing views on there. It’s almost as bad as Apple news. Complete dog shite


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    East Coast
    Posts
    918
    Feedback Score
    0
    People still have facebook?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    539
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tgizzard View Post
    People still have facebook?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Good one. I left in 2017. I can’t believe more people didn’t leave when Cuckerburg said that Facebook users were dumb f@ckers. Insanity


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    2,767
    Feedback Score
    0
    Yeah, sorry. Never been on facebook. Maybe I don't know what I'm missing but, meh.

    Keep up with friends by email, phone calls, group video calls, and weird as it may sound... actually seeing and talking to each other. Weird I know but I'm just odd like that.

    This forum is basically the extent of my social media. I am therefore expecting y'all to step up your game on "misinformation" and "conspiracy thoeries" so I don't feel like I'm missing out.
    Go Ukraine! Piss on the Russian dead.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    223
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    For the record people using Facebook don't think you're smarter for not using it and the people who never even signed up or already left are just measuring pricks to see who's better.

    This is not what I intended with my post, it wasn't about who left and how dumb people are for all staying on the platform. It was about the white houses obvious hypocrisy.

    I really don't get (Communism I get it) how they can consider people banable for false Covid facts not allowing the real facts to get out because they're drowning out the so called real facts. Not that I agree with what they consider real facts.

    The left has used Facebook as a means of delivery for all their information. How, by blocking anything they don't agree with.

    Facebook isn't connecting with friends, it's leftist propaganda
    Last edited by Twilk73; 07-17-21 at 07:52.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    North Alabama
    Posts
    5,311
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    I never would consider Facebook as news media. Admittedly my wife has FB, I don't, so my exposure is limited to funny videos and pics/news of freinds and family. IMHO, thats what FB should be.

    If the Whitehouse can direct who is and isn't allowed a voice on FB, then FB is facilitating an unconstitutional attack on freedom of speech.

    Andy
    Last edited by AndyLate; 07-17-21 at 08:02.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,513
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    If any institution should be held accountable for spreading misinformation, it should be the US Government.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,422
    Feedback Score
    0
    Not a lawyer, but it seems it would help Trump’s case against Facebook that they are a de facto govt agency if the WH says jump and Zuck has how many centimeters…
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    2,767
    Feedback Score
    0
    So at what point does FB become "an agent of the government"? If they conspire to spread an official narrative, silencing dissent and even silencing proven facts and legitimate information at the behest of and for the express purpose of benefitting some or all of the government.

    FWIW, I don't condemn folks for doing FB, and it ain't virtue signaling on my part that I don't. My wife uses it, but has concerns. Got other F&F that dig it. I don't, that's all. Who knows, maybe if I and a lot of others like me did it would be harder for them to turn it into a Marxist woke echo chamber. Meh, just not my thing. Doesn't make me smarter, more dialed in, or anything of the kind.
    Go Ukraine! Piss on the Russian dead.

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •