Commentary on the brcc drama, what is valued, and description of a man named Kyle Rittenhouse.
https://www.revolver.news/2021/07/bl...ew-york-times/
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Site Sponsor
Commentary on the brcc drama, what is valued, and description of a man named Kyle Rittenhouse.
https://www.revolver.news/2021/07/bl...ew-york-times/
Member
It's not often that I make it through an article and come out the other side in complete agreement.
Pretty much spot on.
BRCC certainly isn't the only company to do it, and they won't be the last either. The gullibility of the right has been, and likely will be, its demise.
Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk
Site Sponsor
Insightful and enlightening.
Subject Matter Expert
That entire article was everything that I have come to expect form the liberal media. Nothing but trash. Everything was taken out of context and they are trying to divide anything that isn't their libtard BS point of view. Only thing they got right was Evan's name.
Total SH!T.........
In no way do I make any money from anyone related to the firearms industry.
"I have never heard anyone say after a firefight that I wish that I had not taken so much ammo.", ME
"Texas can make it without the United States, but the United States can't make it without Texas !", General Sam Houston
Member
Article is pure gas-lighting BS.
It assumes that ALL conservatives agree with and support racist behavior.
“Black Rifle actually hates populists and conservatives. In fact, it’s willing to pay you to never be their customer again. That’s the takeaway....”
The author’s conclusion is because BRCC takes action against racist symbols and behaviors.
"Jill, if there's ever a problem, just walk out on the balcony ... take that double-barrel shotgun and fire two blasts outside the house,.." VP Joe Biden Feb 19, 2013
Site Sponsor
Saint Michael and an American willing to risk everything to defend an American city are symbols and behaviors of racism now?Originally Posted by Ready.Fire.Aim
Site Sponsor
This ^^^ A pro 2A, pro LEO, pro Mil, pro America business owner gives an interview to the NYT in the hopes of highlighting veterans issues, (in specific those dealing with veteran amputees) The NYT then spins that interview out of context with the clear intent to stir the pot and sow division amongst the 2A crowd. Crazy that so many folks here on m4c now take the NYT at their word. Seems like y’all took the bait. Well played.
Senior Member
Gee, I can't believe the New York Times would do something like that....Oh, wait....
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial_of_the_Holodomor
When you are a willing participant in the murder of millions I guess "ambushing" a couple of Bro Vets couldn't be reasonably forseen....
The truth can only offend those who live a lie.
Site Sponsor
A few points:
1) they chose to sit down with NY Times for the interview
2) what was printed goes hand in hand with BRCC social media posts concerning Kyle Rittenhouse which certainly were not pro 2A
3) what was printed goes hand in hand with BRCC employee political donations
They do seem to be pro mil/le. Their response to a US citizen defending other US citizens and business from the attack of a left wing mob casts some doubt on the pro 2A and pro business PR.
Last edited by jsbhike; 07-24-21 at 09:02.
Member
Bro-vets gonna bro-vet. They rode the Trump/red wave, but they didn’t change tactics when the the theatre changed. Whether they got had by the NYT or not, they aren’t very slick.
The age of the bro-vet and “thank me for my service” is over, 5th Gen warfare and whatnot.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks