And back to masks (7/21)

[GTF425]

Ill OPENLY ask this...and you can PM ME an answer if you know....WHERE CAN I GET A VAC CARD WITHOUT GETTING THE VAC?

https://ahca DOT myflorida DOT com/docs/2020_COVID_19_Vaccination_Record_Card DOT pdf

110lb card stock.

[flenna]

For all the Charlie Browns out there.

Attachment 66203

[AndyLate]

We are back to masks at work, vaccine or no vaccine. Space and Defense company in Alabama. Also required in all federal buildings in N. Alabama.

Andy

[Grand58742]

You know, I'm not a totally tin foil hat kinda guy... have become that way in the last year or so, but still, something like this should be alarming even if it is for "humanitarian" purposes.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...n-Settings.pdf

The shielding approach aims to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (“high-risk”) and the general population (“low-risk”). High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or “green zones” established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting. They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.

Current evidence indicates that older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions are at higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19. In most humanitarian settings, older population groups make up a small percentage of the total population. For this reason, the shielding approach suggests physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population to prioritize the use of the limited available resources and avoid implementing long-term containment measures among the general population.

In theory, shielding may serve its objective to protect high-risk populations from disease and death. However, implementation of the approach necessitates strict adherence to protocol. Inadvertent introduction of the virus into a green zone may result in rapid transmission among the most vulnerable populations the approach is trying to protect.

I know it's designed for "refugee camps" and whatnot, but you know someone at the Federal level has already looked at this and said "you know, this could work on a nationwide level..."

Dropping the un-vaxxed into camps where they can't harm anyone else. Don't even argue the ridiculousness of the idea. We passed ridiculous and went to absurd in the last year.

[SomeOtherGuy]

You know, I'm not a totally tin foil hat kinda guy... have become that way in the last year or so, but still, something like this should be alarming even if it is for "humanitarian" purposes.
***
Dropping the un-vaxxed into camps where they can't harm anyone else. Don't even argue the ridiculousness of the idea. We passed ridiculous and went to absurd in the last year.

1) We are reaching levels of Clownworld (TM) that shouldn't even be possible.

2) I wanna name the first camp "Andersonville."

3) If you read this with absolutely zero knowledge of either recent history (like Cuomo's and Whitmer's nursing homes) or 20th Century history, it's not totally crazy, although it definitely reflects a total-war approach to this virus with a roughly 0.025% death rate. But apart from the really tinfoil view, this looks a lot like what the "D" state governors did with nursing homes, which resulted in roughly half of all Covid-19 fatalities in the US last year.

[utahjeepr]

I'm thinking that camp shit is more " how to deal in existing situations" like refugee camps abroad and such. No need to get too tinfoil just yet. No that I'd put it past these statist filth.

On a personal level, my employer is being pretty supportive. As federal contractors we are bound by the rules Shithizpants has put in play. The company says we ain't gonna ask our people and we ain't gonna segregate our people. So everybody will follow the alternate protocols so masking and testing for all. I just gotta decide if I'm OK with that on a personal level. As Chuckman said somewhere, I can't feed my family with my principles.

I masked up all last year on the job. It didn't hurt me. The main problem was as fed employees started trickling back in. There is a weird dynamic in the federal world. Not all, but a LOT of federal employees get off on treating contractors like shit. We would get all kinds of spurious complaints about not wearing masks and the like. It's just a power trip game. I also had a few tests last year, and I had lingering nose bleed issues well into this year, which can't be a good thing. Don't know what's up with that but I've never had the issue before they started scratching at the inside of my skull with their swabs.

Not an issue right now, but it's coming and I'll have to get off the fence.

[Disciple]

Don't even argue the ridiculousness of the idea. We passed ridiculous and went to absurd in the last year.

1) We are reaching levels of Clownworld (TM) that shouldn't even be possible.

[DG23]

For all the Charlie Browns out there.

Attachment 66203

You pretty much nailed it there.

From the very beginning that goal post has steadily kept right on moving... It will never stop moving

[Diamondback]

You pretty much nailed it there.

From the very beginning that goal post has steadily kept right on moving... It will never stop moving

Not until or unless we can get someone elected in '24 who will summarily shitcan the whole CDC-NIH-NIAID Alphabet Soup indiscriminately, and can get it done and make it stick before the Deep State vermin strike back.

[Gabriel556]

I was downtown Chicago today at the federal courthouse and the whole downtown from the train station all the up to and inside the courthouse was exactly like last summer. Masks everywhere, wash hands and sanitize everything. Ghost town in buildings, and there was barely anybody on the train or in Ogilvie. There were 7 vehicles in the train parking lot where at 8am that lot used to be full. You’d never think that Lollapalooza happened this weekend, this looked like early summer 2020 again.