Something that keeps being skipped when people keep bringing up the lawsuits is the gun did not just out of the blue go off. The same story of “put my hand on the gun when it was in the holster” is the reoccurring theme going on which is the same thing that happened with a lot of the Glock leg incidents.
I am not talking about myself. If you actually took the time to read what I wrote you would understand that.
I carry a p365. I carry a glock. I am looking at things objectively and saying there are designs that are more safe in others, because they have extra layers of safety engineered into them.
This has nothing to do with me.
Fatigue is also not B.S. Things like heat exhaustion are a real thing and they effect ones ability to make good decisions. People die from fatigue every year. I am guessing you have never had to suffer through osha training courses.
My ego is not invested in my guns. I can own and appreciate a firearm, and at the same time criticize its design
Soli Deo Gloria
Do you have proof that the issues being reported aren't trigger issues? I'm talking post upgrade.
It seems to me like a lot of them are explained by poor trigger control. Which is a real issue--I'm a clumsy person too, which is why I want a manual safety on any pistol I keep loaded, particularly striker fired. For me that's the right choice, I'm not an elite operator and I'll make a mistake one day (like a cord dangling in the holster) and I'll be saved by the safety.
More redundancy is better than less.
I clean my gun on my dining room table. The safest direction is still going to put a hole in my floor and an indoor discharge is likely going to damage my hearing. I'd prefer not to have a negligent discharge at all and not rely only on ensureling no one get shot.
So a gun that has extra safety features built in is strictly better than one that doesn't, so long as those features aren't interfering with normal use.
I wish Glock had a better takedown, I wish it had a thumb safety, just like I wish the P320 internal safety blocked that striker. None of them are perfect, but they're all pretty good
I feel like we, the gun buying public should always be demanding more in these areas, and over the years we have gotten more. Pistols today are much safer than fifty years ago, but they can still all be made better.
Everyone overlooks the most obvious thing. Your gun is already loaded. If you can manage to keep your finger off the trigger then you can manage to disassemble the gun without an ND.
Somehow we manage to carry and hold loaded weapons that at any moment with the millisecond break in concentration we could pull the trigger and no one is calling that a flaw
Sent from my moto z4 using Tapatalk
Yes.
Plus, Police agencies are slow to change / upgrade because "this is the way we've always done it..."
As for trigger-pulling Glock-like feild stripping it's not just ME who has to be cognizant of procedure.
Ever been at a range, or Police office, or buddies house when they start to feild strip a weapon? Especially a non-enthusiest Police Officer with Glock or similar?
I have as have many of us. I do my best to keep an eye on them or just leave the room by rounding the nearest solid obstacle or concrete wall.
Sometimes people dont just "Glock leg" themselves, they shoot someone else.
I know Glocks are reliable, light weapons but they and Sig 320's arent the only gun in town. I only recommend Glocks for consideration to pragmatic, experienced, mechanically knowledgeable firearm enthusiasts.
I think there are better options today for general Police issue.
Last edited by Ron3; 08-23-21 at 16:06.
I agree, and this is the point I was trying to make about the glock, which is a firearm I like. People always misinterpret my critique of certain firearms as a lack of confidence in myself. It's not, it's a lack of confidence in the general public that I have
On top of that, when people shoot themselves with their guns, it makes the entire 2A community look bad, because the MSM and politicians spin the situation into "guns err bad"
Soli Deo Gloria
Bookmarks