Last edited by dan1612; 08-27-21 at 09:26.
If all you do is gaming, sure, you can game the game and know what you’re going to shoot. I live in an area that has several miles of visibility on a normal day though and just completed a couple weeks of special reconnaissance training with many more miles of training area. 4x optics were terribly inadequate in PID and while unlikely for a civilian in CONUS, if you do have the financial ability, seems prudent to prepare for the unexpected.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sic semper tyrannis.
That doesn’t even mention the benefits of FFP over SFP and how much more usable the reticle is on the 1-10.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sic semper tyrannis.
^ Thats fair.
As always, mission drives the gear.
AQ planned for years and sent their A team to carry out the attacks, and on Flight 93 they were thwarted by a pick-up team made up of United Frequent Fliers. Many people look at 9/11 and wonder how we can stop an enemy like that. I look at FL93 and wonder, "How can we lose?". -- FromMyColdDeadHand
Thank you, gentlemen.
Some other points I’d forgotten - the throw lever is not only included on the 1-10 ($50-60 extra on top of 1-6 price), it’s far easier to spin so it’s more useable. And, all other things being equal (honestly not sure that they are but I assume so), the 34mm tube will allow better light transmission so increased performance in low light.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sic semper tyrannis.
Tube diameter has virtually nothing to due with light transmission.
https://www.bushnell.com/through-the...in-optics.html
I'm anxiously awaiting my own Gen III Razor to go atop a Colt 901 for many of the points you listed above. Namely, the usability at 1x and the reticle subtensions remaining consistent across the higher magnification range.
Bookmarks