When’s the next lock down for COOF?

**Diamondback** · 09-16-21, 14:55

Originally Posted by Averageman

We were ripe for this, we've been playing the MSM 24 hr news cycle, "Gin us up some fear Please!" game for a couple of decades now. This is the end result, compliance through fear is the tool they are using and we're all eating it up with big "F'ing" spoons.
It wont be long and watching for it, someone's Kids are going to be taken from them because Mom and Dad wont vax them.

Already happened in IL. Noncustodial parent gets told "because you DARE question Herr Doktor Fauci and refuse the jab, no more visitation or even contact until you can PROVE your Wrongthink has been permanently corrected."

**tgizzard** · 09-16-21, 15:22

Originally Posted by Averageman

.It wont be long and watching for it, someone's Kids are going to be taken from them because Mom and Dad wont vax them.

That’ll be a line they don’t want to cross.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

**mRad** · 09-16-21, 15:49

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

**Gabriel556** · 09-16-21, 16:01

Originally Posted by Business_Casual

Masks forever!

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...-mask-mandate/

Originally Posted by Diamondback

Already happened in IL. Noncustodial parent gets told "because you DARE question Herr Doktor Fauci and refuse the jab, no more visitation or even contact until you can PROVE your Wrongthink has been permanently corrected."

Originally Posted by tgizzard

That’ll be a line they don’t want to cross.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usa...amp/5647445001

From the article:
A judge in Chicago inibarred Rebecca Firlit, the mother of an 11-year-old boy, from seeing her son under partial parental custody because she is not vaccinated against COVID-19.
Ferlit appealed the decision, claiming the judge was placing his views onto her, and on Tuesday it was reversed.

“I’ve had adverse reactions to vaccines in the past and was advised not to get vaccinated by my doctor. It poses a risk,” Ferlit told the Chicago Sun-Times. “I was confused because (the hearing) was just supposed to be about expenses and child support. I asked him what it had to do with the hearing, and he said, ‘I am the judge, and I make the decisions for your case.’ ”

Firlit’s lawyer, Annette Fernholz, told several Chicago media outlets that Firlit and her former husband have been divorced for seven years and that the ex-husband did not address the lack of vaccination as a problem. The two share custody.

Now this did get reversed at a later date due in part to public complaints but we will see how this works out in the future.

**okie** · 09-16-21, 16:12

Originally Posted by Gabriel556

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usa...amp/5647445001

From the article:
A judge in Chicago inibarred Rebecca Firlit, the mother of an 11-year-old boy, from seeing her son under partial parental custody because she is not vaccinated against COVID-19.
Ferlit appealed the decision, claiming the judge was placing his views onto her, and on Tuesday it was reversed.

“I’ve had adverse reactions to vaccines in the past and was advised not to get vaccinated by my doctor. It poses a risk,” Ferlit told the Chicago Sun-Times. “I was confused because (the hearing) was just supposed to be about expenses and child support. I asked him what it had to do with the hearing, and he said, ‘I am the judge, and I make the decisions for your case.’ ”

Firlit’s lawyer, Annette Fernholz, told several Chicago media outlets that Firlit and her former husband have been divorced for seven years and that the ex-husband did not address the lack of vaccination as a problem. The two share custody.

Now this did get reversed at a later date due in part to public complaints but we will see how this works out in the future.

The judge should be prosecuted for violating her rights. HIPPA means nothing now.

**mRad** · 09-16-21, 16:15

Originally Posted by okie

The judge should be prosecuted for violating her rights. HIPPA means nothing now.

Can you cite to me where HIPPA privacy violations apply to judges? Or to anybody outside of those receiving health information commercially?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

**okie** · 09-16-21, 17:25

Originally Posted by mRad

Can you cite to me where HIPPA privacy violations apply to judges? Or to anybody outside of those receiving health information commercially?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Cite where judges can arbitrarily compel people to reveal their medical history. Can you imagine if a judge had demanded to know if she had ever had an abortion?

**mRad** · 09-16-21, 17:27

Originally Posted by okie

Cite where judges can arbitrarily compel people to reveal their medical history. Can you imagine if a judge had demanded to know if she had ever had an abortion?

You’re citing HIPPA. I’ve explained HIPPA to you multiple times, but you keep getting it wrong.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk