Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Beretta 1301 With Crom and RMR: Patterning Federal Flite Control and Slugs

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    District 11
    Posts
    6,346
    Feedback Score
    24 (100%)

    Beretta 1301 With Crom and RMR: Patterning Federal Flite Control and Slugs

    I installed my Crom mount (with Haught mod) and a 6.5 MOA RMR I got for cheap. I got it zeroed at 50 Yards with Ranger Low Recoil Slugs and it patterned perfectly at 30 feet and still sub paper plate and dead on at 25 yards. This thing is DEFINITELY my favorite shotgun ever (finally, my old 870 has slipped to second). I actually had a previous version of this shotgun about 10 years ago and a benelli super 90 but this thing is amazing. Not only is it super fast, if feeds everything from fancy Buckshot to Wal Mart garbage gauge.

    Be forewarned. I probably should edit this down but I am too lazy tonight. LOL


    Let those who are fond of blaming and finding fault, while they sit safely at home, ask, ‘Why did you not do thus and so?’I wish they were on this voyage; I well believe that another voyage of a different kind awaits them.”

    Christopher Columbus

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    3,485
    Feedback Score
    58 (100%)
    Good for you. Shooting a hard recoiling long arm from bench or prone is NOT enjoyable.
    At least your Beretta is a gas gun.

    My 1301 shoots the 00 Flight Control best with an IC choke. I was surprised how tight it was at 25 yds. Rio garbage 00 Buck was 5X the spread at same distance.
    A true "Gun Guy" (or gal) should have familiarity and a modicum of proficiency with most all firearms platforms.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,322
    Feedback Score
    0
    Love my 1301, and mine also like the Federal Flight Control 00 loads. Beretta hit it out of the park with these shotguns.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    8,431
    Feedback Score
    9 (100%)
    My buddy juts bought one of these 1301's and they are supposed to be very nice. That Federal Flight control is good stuff.

    PB
    "Air Force / Policeman / Fireman / Man of God / Friend of mine / R.I.P. Steve Lamy"

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    District 11
    Posts
    6,346
    Feedback Score
    24 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by gaijin View Post
    Good for you. Shooting a hard recoiling long arm from bench or prone is NOT enjoyable.
    At least your Beretta is a gas gun.

    My 1301 shoots the 00 Flight Control best with an IC choke. I was surprised how tight it was at 25 yds. Rio garbage 00 Buck was 5X the spread at same distance.

    I actually just fired 5 shots of Rio 00 Buck "reduced recoil" and I can confirm it is nowhere near as good as the flite control. At 30 foot it took up the whole bottom half of the paper plate. Not quite 5x, but much worse. Still wouldn't want to get shot at with it, and it was cheap as hell.
    Let those who are fond of blaming and finding fault, while they sit safely at home, ask, ‘Why did you not do thus and so?’I wish they were on this voyage; I well believe that another voyage of a different kind awaits them.”

    Christopher Columbus

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,096
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Bell View Post
    I actually just fired 5 shots of Rio 00 Buck "reduced recoil" and I can confirm it is nowhere near as good as the flite control. At 30 foot it took up the whole bottom half of the paper plate. Not quite 5x, but much worse. Still wouldn't want to get shot at with it, and it was cheap as hell.
    It didn't feel "low recoil" to me.

    Seemed like regular ol' buckshot with "low recoil" on the box.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    3,485
    Feedback Score
    58 (100%)
    ^^Same experience with Rio “Low Recoil”.

    And at 25 yds I had 2 pellets completely off a full size IPSC target.
    The flight control load was 7” to 8” at that distance with same choke (IC).
    A true "Gun Guy" (or gal) should have familiarity and a modicum of proficiency with most all firearms platforms.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    District 11
    Posts
    6,346
    Feedback Score
    24 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron3 View Post
    It didn't feel "low recoil" to me.

    Seemed like regular ol' buckshot with "low recoil" on the box.
    LOL. Totally agree.
    Let those who are fond of blaming and finding fault, while they sit safely at home, ask, ‘Why did you not do thus and so?’I wish they were on this voyage; I well believe that another voyage of a different kind awaits them.”

    Christopher Columbus

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    6,762
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    My only critique is that you should fire at least 5 shot groups, better yet 10, to get an idea of what's actually going on. I have ALSO discovered that shotguns need muscle. You do not gently squeeze the trigger while stabilizing the gun. You deliberately pull the trigger while holding the gun like you're trying to give a bobcat a pill. This is because shotguns have low velocity ammunition, and long (relatively) barrels. They will actually move about 1/2" during the time the slug is in the barrel, under recoil. Muscle the gun hard, and it will be more consistent and shoot tighter groups by a notable amount. This is part of why I prefer to zero a shotgun while standing, holding it aggressively, at 50 yards. This will allow the most consistent compromise for a zero that will be as close as possible across all shooting positions.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,096
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Disciple View Post
    I will start a new thread if there is not a simple answer to this. I see a lot of talk of reduced recoil and very tight buckshot patterning. If extra tight patterns are desired why not use slugs, or a rifle? If full power 12 gauge shells are undesirable why not use a 20 gauge, or a gun modified for 12ga mini shells for extra capacity? I am not a shotgunner and I am not questioning the choices of those who are. I just want to understand.
    It's a good question.

    The "problem" with standard shells is the pellets can strike less vital, peripheral areas of the target or miss completely beyond about 15 yds.

    IMO that performance is fine for in the home self defense but some may disagree.

    Firing at ranges beyond that starts getting irresponsible when you know some of your pellets will miss. If your backstop is a feild or woods or something very solid fine but if not or unknown you could be liable in many ways for those stray pellets.

    Tight patterns help reduce this.

    Slugs work to, you're right. But then you have a hard kicking not very accurate "rifle". May as well use an actual rifle. "Just because you can do a thing..."

    I like using low-recoil slugs for shotgun practice because I can really see the center of where I aimed and they tear up targets much less.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •