Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 39

Thread: Brownells' new "Super Duty" AR-15

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,485
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Grendelshooter View Post
    *Laughs in M1 Garand*
    *laughs back in Winchester 1873*
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    564
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by alx01 View Post
    This is when people realized that Taliban had more modern ARs than a new Brownells Retro which was only marketed for hype had no practical purpose other than to increase sales and youtube views.
    I don’t think it was so much as a steep dive but simply it’s targeted audience. The retro audience, for anything (cars, guns, etc) is a small one. It’s a niche market, something for collectors, and I think it ran its normal course. I watched some videos and I never got the feeling they were trying to replace modern rifles or get someone who would’ve normally purchased a modern rifle to purchase a retro one. For me the videos were just simply meant to show the old style rifles could still perform to an extent like the young buck rifles. All for fun.

    Retro style rifles like that are meant to be limited production and meant to generate buzz and interest. Which it did. Mission accomplished.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4,383
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Grendelshooter View Post
    *Laughs in M1 Garand*
    Quote Originally Posted by Diamondback View Post
    *laughs back in Winchester 1873*
    They just won't be laughing if it's dark outside.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    884
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by TAZ View Post
    $2400. Ouch


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    You figure Knights go for $2800-$3000 now and this has the same enhancements and arguably better fit and finish.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    341
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Im amazed. That might even be uglier than a Daniel Defense, I wouldn't have thought that possible.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    140
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Diamondback View Post
    *laughs back in Winchester 1873*
    88097C3A-6809-4E46-A6B7-7439AD8D6802.gif
    Last edited by Grendelshooter; 09-22-21 at 22:01.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Found a home.
    Posts
    1,149
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I love my pre-'91 Colt 723ish build and I take pride in making hits out to 300yrds with the A1 sights. But I realize that a flattop with an optical sight is way more efficient and effective. I still embrace retro and lots of people do, knowing full well that a modern build is better in almost every way.

    I hope Brownells continues to support the retro crowd.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,083
    Feedback Score
    0
    Windham Weaponry was supposed to do an A2 (which I guess is kind of retro), but last I heard they were having trouble finding the fixed carry handle forgings. Seems that nobody's making them (or very few of them) at present.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Found a home.
    Posts
    1,149
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Slater View Post
    Windham Weaponry was supposed to do an A2 (which I guess is kind of retro), but last I heard they were having trouble finding the fixed carry handle forgings. Seems that nobody's making them (or very few of them) at present.
    Yeah, the older we get the more retro opportunities we have....

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    581
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by El Vaquero View Post
    I don’t think it was so much as a steep dive but simply it’s targeted audience. The retro audience, for anything (cars, guns, etc) is a small one. It’s a niche market, something for collectors, and I think it ran its normal course. I watched some videos and I never got the feeling they were trying to replace modern rifles or get someone who would’ve normally purchased a modern rifle to purchase a retro one. For me the videos were just simply meant to show the old style rifles could still perform to an extent like the young buck rifles. All for fun.

    Retro style rifles like that are meant to be limited production and meant to generate buzz and interest. Which it did. Mission accomplished.
    I agree. I was just surprised how much retro theme was going around seemingly everywhere. I don't have anything against it, just don't particularly understand the appeal of retro, fake battleworn, or "let me spend 500 hours on the internet and clone a black hawk down rifle for $3,000 in my mom's basement".

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •