Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Drawbacks to semi-auto bolt carriers?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    33
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    There have been third party tests previously posted here showing that a heavier reciprocating mass has reliability benefits for M4 style AR type rifles (e.g. carbine length has system)

    Without repeating all the details, the two key benefits are:

    a) more mass in the BCG and buffer increase inertia and delay unlocking and extraction which allows a bit more time for chamber pressure to drop and the fired case to shrink thus reducing extraction effort. This reduces failures to extract.

    b) more mass in the BCG and buffer increase momentum while stripping and chambering a new round which enables the rifle to overcome fouling and other factors (lack of lube, dirt, carbon fouling, bent rounds, etc)

    Stronger recoil spring also helps.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    33
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    BCG and buffer mass aids in reliable extraction and chambering.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    2,872
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    The difference in mass between LMT style semi and full carriers is inconsequential, much less than the difference between buffer types.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    432
    Feedback Score
    46 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd.K View Post
    The weight difference is minimal...
    I've weighed both, it's about 0.3 oz difference.

    Sent from my Pixel 3a XL using Tapatalk

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •