Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33

Thread: My new Form 1 build

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    2,584
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)

    My new Form 1 build

    @MistWolf @Clint

    Here's a sketch of the internals. Pretty self explanatory.



    All but the first baffle single clipped. At 5.5" it's not exactly a K can, but it's still shorter than average, and lighter.

    So far I've only tried it on my Mk18 upper. I need to remove my 6920's flash hider so I can try it on the 16 inch, which is what my SOT tested it with.

    I took a few shots sans ear pro, and it wasn't exactly pleasant, but also not painful either. But the port pop alone on a 10.3 is way past hearing safe anyways. My SOT went sans ear pro with his 16 inch upper, and he indicated it was hearing safe based on comparing it to a factory can that is a known quantity. Part of that could of course be the tone, so I wouldn't want to do that very often without good sound metering equipment to back it up.

    On my Mk18, I might compare it to maybe shooting a 9mm pistol in terms of discomfort. Part of what makes me think I'm mostly hearing port pop is that I tried it with and without the distal cone (using a longer spacer in the blast chamber), and there was no notable difference, which you would expect there to be. I think once I do the same side by side comparison in both configurations on my 16" upper it's going to become apparent that there's a difference. If not I will just lose the distal cone and let the gasses from the coaxial chamber go straight into the distal space. My endcap of choice has some nice stepping, so that should help.

    I also need to get out the nods and see what difference it makes for flash. Word on the street is that coaxials somehow reduce flash via some mechanism I've yet to grasp. Would be very cool if there was a notable reduction.

    I can also move that unported cone anywhere in the stack, so I might try different positions and see what effect it has on backpressure.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Lowcountry, SC.
    Posts
    6,233
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by okie View Post
    I can also move that unported cone anywhere in the stack, so I might try different positions and see what effect it has on backpressure.
    Please do.
    RLTW

    “What’s New” button, but without GD: https://www.m4carbine.net/search.php...new&exclude=60 , courtesy of ST911.

    Disclosure: I am affiliated PRN with a tactical training center, but I speak only for myself. I have no idea what we sell, other than CLP and training. I receive no income from sale of hard goods.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    3,516
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    That's no garden variety F1 can, with coaxial bypass.

    Nice job Okie!

    Is this a kit or self design?

    Materials?

    Quote Originally Posted by okie View Post

    Here's a sketch of the internals. Pretty self explanatory.
    Black River Tactical
    BRT OPTIMUM Hammer Forged Chrome Lined Barrels - 11.5", 12.5", 14.5", 16"
    BRT EZTUNE Preset Gas Tubes - PISTOL, CAR, MID, RIFLE
    BRT Bolt Carrier Groups M4A1, M16 CHROME
    BRT Covert Comps 5.56, 6X, 7.62

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    2,584
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Clint View Post
    That's no garden variety F1 can, with coaxial bypass.

    Nice job Okie!

    Is this a kit or self design?

    Materials?
    It's a hodgepodge of off the shelf solvent trap parts. That market is getting really good! With a little basic understanding of how silencers work the average person can put together a pretty good can to meet most needs, whether that be pistol, rimfire, or centerfire rifle. I think this style fits the needs of centerfire SBRs extremely well. It's a good balance between weight, length, suppression, and backpressure mitigation.

    The thread adapter and endcap are SPC, the tube is SPC, and the cones are VVT. I got the spacing material off a guy on the form 1 forum.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    33,984
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    When I think back to what was state of the art for 1978, the fact that people are now home rolling designs like this, it must be what bi plane fliers felt like watching us go to the moon in 69.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    2,584
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    When I think back to what was state of the art for 1978, the fact that people are now home rolling designs like this, it must be what bi plane fliers felt like watching us go to the moon in 69.
    Yea we've come a long way from maglites and freeze plugs. Amazing how much innovation people are capable of when the government makes you wait six months to two years for a freaking gun muffler.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    33,984
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by okie View Post
    Yea we've come a long way from maglites and freeze plugs. Amazing how much innovation people are capable of when the government makes you wait six months to two years for a freaking gun muffler.
    So I can remember wipe and mesh technology. I can remember about mid 80s when Doc Dater changed the game for everyone for all time. Now most of that stuff is pretty old hat.

    Now that $200 isn't nearly as cost prohibitive for serious gun guys, suppressors have become "common usage" and that is really driving the tech. By contrast, machine gun tech has gone almost nowhere because private sector advances came to an end in 1986. KAC kicks out an interesting design now and then but there is no across the board revelations other than make it out of polymer and add rails.

    Suppressors are not only smaller and more efficient, they are now in many cases user serviceable which was a unicorn dream not very long ago.

    I can still remember hanging a sionics can almost as long as the rifle itself on a M-16 and thinking "there has to be a better way."
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,321
    Feedback Score
    0
    That looks amazing.

    I would shorten the blast chamber spacer and put another in another baffle (shortening the blast chamber)...should help with FRP.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    2,584
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by eodinert View Post
    That looks amazing.

    I would shorten the blast chamber spacer and put another in another baffle (shortening the blast chamber)...should help with FRP.
    I wasn't able to detect any first round pop, even in the five baffle configuration. Might be because of the coax chamber, I don't know. Might also become more obvious when I shoot it on the sixteen inch rifle.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,321
    Feedback Score
    0
    Ah, reading it again I see you said 'port pop' and not 'first round pop'. Hooked on phonics didn't work for me.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •