Saw a blurb today where there may be a new variant out of Botswana. Possibly a strain emerging from HIV patients?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rain-EVER.html
Saw a blurb today where there may be a new variant out of Botswana. Possibly a strain emerging from HIV patients?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rain-EVER.html
What if this whole crusade's a charade?
And behind it all there's a price to be paid
For the blood which we dine
Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…
If you haven't read "The Real Anthony Fauci" you're missing out on a helluva lot! At least get the audible version and listen to it. Speed up the play time to at least 1.5
You won't outvote the corruption.
Sic Semper Tyrannis
This is what ALL our judges etc... need to start doing to the press
The AZ AG is getting asked his VAX status so he then asks a reporter “have you ever had a STD” the look on the gals face behind him was priceless to
Start listening to this at about 20 minutes. Dr Martin explains Covid in less than 10 minutes.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas...=1000542888249
You won't outvote the corruption.
Sic Semper Tyrannis
Brnovich is going to run for Senate. Not hard to decide who I'm voting for!
Infamous double
Still fighting with the Bureau for not getting the vaccine, been forced to test every 72 hours, have to wear mask at all times unless eating or drinking. Whole office has to wear mask when moving about or anytime not sitting at desk away from others but I hadn't been doing that. Then was threatened with disciplinary action, written up for insubordination if I continued. So I am wearing the mask. Talked with the SAC today looking to see why only the unvaccinated are required to test when CDC's own site acknowledges that the vaccinated can carry the virus as well.
"Why "zombies"? Because calling it 'training to stop a rioting, starving, panicking, desperate mob after a complete governmental financial collapse apocalypse' is just too wordy." or in light of current events: training to stop a rioting, looting, molotov cocktail throwing, skinny jeans wearing, uneducated bunch of lemmings duped by, or working directly for, a marxist organization attempting to tear down America while hiding behind a race-based name
How ironic is it that if you protest the Vax, your a Terrorist, but if you drive an SUV in to a crowd at a Christmas parade, the media doesn't say sh*t.
rocsteady, and anyone else who works for the Federal government and is fighting its various mandates, you should read the court decision linked here:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...terchangeable/
A brief summary from the article:
The plaintiffs lost in this hearing, but the decision is very detailed and is very skeptical on the DOD's claim that EUA Pfizer is equivalent to FDA-approved Comirnaty. It states that they are not legally equivalent, that the FDA has conceded this point, and explains material differences in both chemistry and quality control between them. The judge questions whether Comirnaty actually exists in the real world, and you could view this loss as on " a mere technicality." Detailed discussion of this point starts on page 13 of the PDF opinion. However, after three pages that seem entirely favorable to plaintiffs, on page 16 the Judge suddenly concludes that the plaintiffs aren't likely to succeed on this, stating:In an order issued Nov. 12 in Doe et al. v. Austin, U.S. Federal District Judge Allen Winsor of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida denied a preliminary injunction requested by 16 service members against the U.S. Military’s COVID vaccine mandate. A hearing is scheduled for Sept. 14, 2022.
However, the judge’s acknowledgment that “the DOD cannot mandate vaccines that only have an EUA” is significant for two reasons.
One reason pertains to the difference in ingredients and manufacturing process between Pfizer’s EUA vaccine and the approved Comirnaty vaccine, and the other pertains to the legal difference between a fully licensed vaccine and an EUA vaccine.
This could be setting the stage for an amended pleading and second hearing, but I'm not following this case enough to know if that's likely at this point.no plaintiff claims he or she was specifically denied a BLA-compliant dose or offered only a dose from a non-BLA-compliant vial. Because the plaintiffs have not shown they are (or will be) required to receive an EUA-labeled, non-BLA compliant vaccine, the plaintiffs have not shown a likelihood of success
If you're outside of that specific lawsuit but ready to make your own challenge, it appears there is a roadmap there to fighting any requirement to take an EUA vaccine. Of course, if properly labeled, FDA-approved Comirnaty actually shows up in the real world, your challenge might then fail.
Bookmarks