You may need to actually look up the term as it applies to legal terminology. Whether ultimately held legally responsible, there's no evidence at all of intent on his part, unless he secretly put the bullets in the gun when no one was looking and intended to shoot her. Not impossible of course, but no evidence for it, hence:
"Involuntary manslaughter is defined as an unintentional killing that results either from recklessness or criminal negligence or from the commission of a low-level criminal act such as a misdemeanor. Involuntary manslaughter is distinguished from other forms of homicide because it does not require deliberation or premeditation, or even intent. Since these mental states are not required, involuntary manslaughter is the lowest category of homicide."
That sounds accurate to what happened from what we know about it, though I do wonder if there was enough evidence to go for Criminal Negligence.
I know those charges vary some by state too. In another state, perhaps they would have felt the evidence rose to Criminal Negligence, I don't know.
Bookmarks