Fauci hates puppies

[Diamondback]

Yup. "Pick your target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize it"--Alinsky the living shit out of this guy.

[Averageman]

Well the NIH threw Fauci under the Bus by releasing the information that, Yes, he was funding gain of function research.

[Diamondback]

Well the NIH threw Fauci under the Bus by releasing the information that, Yes, he was funding gain of function research.

Bear in mind, the director of NIH's Ethics Office who had to approve all Fauci's crap is Mrs. Fauci... so it's a safe bet that anything they do to him gets blowback through her. It's gonna get messy... if it weren't for his wife as a piece in the puzzle, I'd expect them to Pawn sacrifice the man to protect the institution so the rest can continue their Mengele-ing in peace.

[NickySantoro]

I'm sure all you cared a great deal any animal testing before seeing Fauci was distantly was involved.

I did, slick, so put a sock in it.

[glocktogo]

I'm sure all you cared a great deal any animal testing before seeing Fauci was distantly was involved.

You forgot one crucial point. Ethics. You don't outsource medical experiments that meet ethical standards to Tunisia. We have more than enough beagles and sand fleas here in America, so that dog literally won't hunt.

[jsbhike]

You forgot one crucial point. Ethics. You don't outsource medical experiments that meet ethical standards to Tunisia. We have more than enough beagles and sand fleas here in America, so that dog literally won't hunt.

And we have been told by several flunkies on this forum for more than a year that medical/scientific ethics somehow preclude unethical behavior like falsifying numbers.

[Diamondback]

And we have been told by several flunkies on this forum for more than a year that medical/scientific ethics somehow preclude unethical behavior like falsifying numbers.

Ethics Rules, like laws, only have as much meaning as their enforcement.

[jsbhike]

Ethics Rules, like laws, only have as much meaning as their enforcement.

I would guess what most normal people consider ethics either develop(or not) by early to mid teens and(outside of subtle nuances of a given field) are not something that is going to develop in a college class or post college continuing education. That goes for the medical field as shown by the syphilis program, Kermit Gosnell, and the numerous docs making the news every year for ripping off patients and insurance companies.

[Honu]

Well the NIH threw Fauci under the Bus by releasing the information that, Yes, he was funding gain of function research.

Thought it was more that one group (forgot name not veritas either) that got in dug around found stuff got it released it ? Then they had no choice ? But not sure

[SteyrAUG]

I'm sure all you cared a great deal any animal testing before seeing Fauci was distantly was involved.

So just to cut right to the chase, I'd have exactly the same objection of Donald Trump or Ronald Reagan did it. Also there is animal testing that is probably necessary in order to advance critical medical science and then there is animal testing to see if this perfume will cause a rash. The former is sometimes necessary (since we aren't gonna be allowed to test on death row convicts) but the latter is BS.

Allowing insects to eat puppies, that really sounds like some BS that isn't in any way necessary to test anything. It sounds like "curiosity" and would only be done by someone who is a complete, soulless ghoul. That they spent $375,800 to learn what happens when sand flies eat beagle puppies is even more objectionable.