Could the prosecutor be begging to get punched in the face any worse? What a weenie POS.
He’s Littlefinger in a suit
Could the prosecutor be begging to get punched in the face any worse? What a weenie POS.
He’s Littlefinger in a suit
Last edited by Waylander; 11-10-21 at 16:56.
Do you even get down innagrass, bro?
Kicked. If "all he uses is one foot" how could Binger protest?
https://youtu.be/mNnfHUtwFBg?t=8170
Why didn't the defense re-cross or what ever with Kyle. Binger drew everything out, probably to cut and splice it for closing. I think the defense needed to point out that Kyle only shot those attacking him- when they came into contact with them.
Plus, who cares if Kyle "Lied" to people on the street or about being an EMT?? Just say that I said I was an EMT because explaining the FD training program is too long.
It was a mistake putting him on the stand. Too risky and is their legal argument any stronger now? Judge won't throw it out and any juror that wants to get Kyle isn't going to be swayed.
Why wouldn't have Kyle had shot himself going down the street? BEcause he knows the law, unlike Binger, and wouldn't shoot someone one that wasn't an active threat- based only on what people are yelling. "He Shot someone"- but he isn't shooting anyone right now....
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Defense goes for a mistrial, and I would not be shocked if they got it considering how many times the judge has told the prosciutto how out of line he was, and finally got visibly pissed:
KENOSHA, Wis. (AP) — The murder case against Kyle Rittenhouse was thrown into jeopardy Wednesday when his lawyers asked for a mistrial over what appeared to be out-of-bounds questions asked of Rittenhouse by the chief prosecutor. The judge did not immediately rule on the request.
https://news.wttw.com/2021/11/10/def...s-murder-trial
If you all didn't see this:
Last edited by WillBrink; 11-10-21 at 18:26.
- Will
General Performance/Fitness Advice for all
www.BrinkZone.com
LE/Mil specific info:
https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/
“Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”
Prosecutor seems to be going for a strategy of Mistrial so they can say "we all KNOW the little bastard is guilty as hell but that damn dirty judge wouldn't let our jury give the uppity little Deplorable what he had coming to him"...
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
Psalms 109:8, 43:1
LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.
I am curious how many cases the prosecutor has prosecuted where something besides a bat, knife or gun was used as a weapon, because according to his questions nothing besides those can hurt you, and even if a pistol is pointed at you it isn’t an actual threat unless the person holding the pistol is using a full arm extension, two hand grip, in a half weaver half isosceles stance as there is no way someone would fire a pistol from any other position.
Last edited by john armond; 11-10-21 at 18:46.
When the judge said that he wanted something from the defense, and then said that he would send something to them- but then said ‘forget it’, I wonder if it was so that he can brush up on mistrial motions and check with some experts.
This thing is the definition of an unfair trial.
First time I’ve ever agreed with Jeffery Tug-tug-tubin.
CNN chief legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin
"The good news for Kyle Rittenhouse is that he's not on trial for being an idiot. He's on trial for homicide."
"This is a tough case for the prosecution because it does seem like he has a plausible case of self-defense and ... if it were illegal to be an idiot, the jails would be even more crowded than they are now. Homicide is a different matter ... he may have a defense here."
Last edited by FromMyColdDeadHand; 11-10-21 at 18:33.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
"Why didn't the defense re-cross or what ever with Kyle. Binger drew everything out, probably to cut and splice it for closing."
I don't think they wanted to re-direct because Binger had not landed any solid blows and Kyle had been up for a long, long time. Now Kyle's testimony is likely closed except for limited purposes during rebuttal. Kyle had (in my opinion) laid out what he had to say and Binger's points were mostly tedium. I think Binger's credibility here is going to be at issue during closing because he stupidly said he was going to show that Kyle chased Rosenbaum( in his opening). Which is patently absurd. So whatever word twisting quotes he has are likely to be pretty ineffective. My favorite was when he tried to get Kyle to say the guy wasn't pointing his gun at him when the "victim" already testified he pointed the gun at him. Jesus what a douchebag.
The real issue here is the state probably has the right to open and close during closing (meaning they get two closings while the defense gets one). This scumbag is likely to just make stuff up during his closing so the defense will have to be ready to object to his closing (which is typically frowned upon).
Let those who are fond of blaming and finding fault, while they sit safely at home, ask, ‘Why did you not do thus and so?’I wish they were on this voyage; I well believe that another voyage of a different kind awaits them.”
Christopher Columbus
Bookmarks