I’ve always been surprised how strong the used Aimpoint market is, especially for a sight that’s what over 11 years old now?
I’ve always been surprised how strong the used Aimpoint market is, especially for a sight that’s what over 11 years old now?
Honestly I was pretty disappointed with the T-2’s brightness. Only the last 3-4 settings were useable and it was def not as bright as T-1. I never had issue with parallax on T-1 or even MRO for that matter. Not saying the reports aren’t true, just that it never impacted my shooting and brightness was/is more important to me. I’m in the market for a T-1 myself now.
A few things here and for OP:
1. The T1 parallax is bad. I owned five and chased zeroes for years. It also has a much bluer lens hue than other optics.
2. The T2 is a much better sight. The housing, glass, lens covers. I believe it to be the best on the market.
3. The CompM5 has two YT videos that fail drop tests y dropping on the battery compartment. The optic fails.
4. Around SN 47K, Aimpoint changed the emitter power where old power 8 now is newer version 9. You need to turn the brightness up one more to get the same output as an older gen. I find this a regression especially since you now lose battery life. I only run T2 gen 1s (all SN 40K and lower) and run them on setting 9 generally. I have owned 11 T2s and sold the 6 that were newer gen.
You sound like a broken record and have regurgitated this over and over and over and over again.
https://www.m4carbine.net/search.php?searchid=4241543
Last edited by mebiuspower; 11-08-21 at 10:06.
1. The references are in separate threads.
2. The questions and concerns about T2 brightness issues persist.
Seems relevant to broaden awareness. Or you can share the search function link in these threads. Or sticky my response where people can go and understand what happened.
If you have astigmatism, the T2 dot is an improvement over the T1
Had a number of H1's and T1's. I found the post 80k serial # MRO a better optic at a lower price point.
My H2 is an improvement on both, but at a higher cost. With my prescription, I think the MRO has a better dot than my H2, but the H2 has less parallax shift. I still think my M4S has the cleanest dot of all of the ones I still have.
If you're in that sub $400 range, I think the MRO is still a decent buy and a better choice than a T1/H1 which will most likely cost you a few bucks more.
- Jeff
“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” ― George Orwell, 1984
Amen. I bought a t2 the other month and after about 15 minutes I sold it. Being outside in the shade, 10 was barely visible. I had read that Aimpoint changed their electronics and they were dimmer 1 level. I too could only use the last 4. 9 indoors was the lowest I could go. So much so that I thought the battery was weak and I changed with a fresh one...No dice. I have a t1 that I have had for 10 years and 7-8ish is fine outside unless its super bright. I love the micros but I was super unhappy with the newer batches of t2's. BTW before any smart assed comments I have 20-10 vision.
Broken record or not I agree with your assessment. Why in the hell have 8 settings that are friggin impossible to see without NVG's. And yes I have some so I understand the first four levels but what about the next 4. Even in a dark room 5-6 are barely bright enough to see. I would have rather made it -1. i.e 7 is now 6. I cant see paying that kind of scratch and barely can see the damn thing. 10-11 outdoors and then 12, surface of the sun setting. Bad news if you ask me
Bookmarks