The obvious answer- they needed to blame it on the bad orange man.Originally Posted by Averageman
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Member
The obvious answer- they needed to blame it on the bad orange man.
Philippians 2:10-11
To argue with a person who renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. ~ Thomas Paine
“The greatest conspiracy theory is the notion that your government cares about you”- unknown.
Senior Member
They are putting their team together.
https://apnews.com/article/united-st...04f73e65659e68
STOP calling them racial justice protests or anti-cop protests. These were direct action violence to bring about a political end- that is the definition of terrorism. They aren’t working for civil rights the cops are just in the way. They are using violence to try to get people silence their political opinions and CHANGE the fundamental nature of our govt from one based on individual rights (and guilt) to collective rights and guilt with out evidence. That is an insurrection. With real guns, real deaths, and real terrorist actions.Several Republican senators sought to shift focus away from Jan. 6 and asserted that the insurrection had taken away attention from the 2020 rioting that erupted in American cities and grew out of racial justice protests.
If saying that these actions are made legit because of racial justice, the 1/6 people can claim that they did it based on patriotism.
I’m just glad that black people stopped being shot by white cops for the last year. Not a single one. Problem solved…
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Senior Member
Meanwhile the Whitmer “kidnapping” conspiracy is proving problematic for DoJ, due to the actions of the FBI’s informants and agents. I keep saying that FBI/DoJ is in the crime manufacturing business and ultimately their TTP’s are going to prove that 1/6 was another one of their ops.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/fbi-knew-...230610798.html
What if this whole crusade's a charade?
And behind it all there's a price to be paid
For the blood which we dine
Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…
Senior Member
Yep, and I hope the right can turn it into a Discovered Attack and the Dems/MSM/FBI are walking into an ambush of their own setting.
Funny how when Trump was in office the FBI/DOJ leaked all kinds of info about Trump, but when it comes to 1/6 agents, we get nothing. If the FBI were a redeemable entity, someone would have leaked something about the agents/CIs/Assets that were there. Frankly, the fact that they did it and didn’t set it up so that they could say “No” tells you how brazen that they have gotten. They don’t care if they caught. Frankly, their answers are exactly what you say to hide guilt.
Maybe that’s been their plan all along. They get caught with their pants down, the MSM gaslights for them- and there are no repercussions- just trying to goad people into reacting.
Last edited by FromMyColdDeadHand; 01-12-22 at 01:00.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Senior Member
IF Trump is legally in jeopardy both criminally and civilly for not acting for two hours to stop the riot on 1/6, what exposure does Biden have for not securing the Southern Border?
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Senior Member
None. There is no rule of law, only different strokes for different folks.
Philippians 2:10-11
To argue with a person who renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. ~ Thomas Paine
“The greatest conspiracy theory is the notion that your government cares about you”- unknown.
Member
I have wondered the same for Anitfa/BLM figureheads.
Senior Member
The 1/6 riot is even more, well, hilarious, when you consider the nation wide rioting would have been if Trump won, or was named the winner. He would have been 'illegit' for some reason, or no real 'reason'. And they wouldn't have had to make up deaths like they did about 1/6.
The three mental midget Generals that were saying that we need to be ready to put down a GOP coup in 2024- I think that is just cover for them to say that when Trump wins again, it was because of the stolen election and he can't take office.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Site Sponsor
First thing that needs to happen if Trump or any other R gets the win and takes the Oath on 1/20/25, recall them all to AD for Court-Martial.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
Psalms 109:8, 43:1
LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.
Senior Member
So the reason that Epps isn’t charged is that he didn’t step into the Capitol grounds, so they have nothing to charge him with.
On the face of that, it seems like it could explain away the issue. Kinzinger says this proves he’s not a FED, but wait a minute…..
Here is a guy who said “Go into the Capitol” (he now says that he meant orderly, like with a ticket), who didn’t go into the Capitol himself. Who tells a guy to take down teh barrier. Almost like someone told him the specific things that he could and couldn’t do- all while advocating for others to break the law.
They think that this clears things up, and maybe it does, but if anything it makes his actions that day even more peculiar. That and no one on oath with disavow him or other suspicious actors.
Also, why is Kinzinger absolving Epps? Why not the DOJ explaining why they wanted him and then didn’t? Could it be that Kinzinger’s legal defense of Epps- sure, he incited the crowd to commit clearly illegal acts but did nothing himself- is basically the Trump defense? And Trump played that hand far better than Epps.
Will Kinzinger come out in defense of Trump now?
So, if Epps is ‘innocent’ and not a FED, does that mean that there weren’t all the other actors that behaved strangely aren’t FEDs. Again, why does the DOJ refuse to state what their actions where around 1/6.
Kinzinger and Amash are both dumb enough (Amash almost seems child like) that they believe the stupidity that comes out of their mouths. Cheney is just pure evil. That she is doing this makes me nervous, like she knows something that she isn’t telling? And I mean some really dirty tricks coming, and the Dems talk about the end of Democracy is again projection.
That and after a whole year the Insurrection is still the rallying cry and no one has been charged with it….
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks