There are many of you who have an issue with the death penalty. In this particular case I am 110% FOR it. I don't give a damn if he's 14 or 15, doesn't matter. There is ZERO doubt about his guilt, he should pay with his life.
There are many of you who have an issue with the death penalty. In this particular case I am 110% FOR it. I don't give a damn if he's 14 or 15, doesn't matter. There is ZERO doubt about his guilt, he should pay with his life.
11C2P '83-'87
Airborne Infantry
F**k China!
Yup, I agree. It was an emotional reaction, the odds of it happening in front of your eyes are rare and there is the great potential to miss context or not see the whole picture...but bad guys shouldn't be accustomed to thinking just because they decided to stop playing that the game is over. If Adam Lanza was confronted and fell into the fetal position crying, he still should have been shot to pieces. Morally and ethically right.
Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk
Never have given a shit about being "insane". If you are that loose mentally you are a danger to society, and locking you away doesn't cut it: the life you have taken is never to be replaced, therefore you forfeit yours.
Remember that crazy bitch in Texas who drowned her FIVE kids, then basically got away with it 'cause she's siiiiick? Screw that, I'd have had her near-drowned 4 times and revived. Then on #5 she goes under for good.
Tracking how I feel about lives taken in cold blood? I don't mean someone who raped your kid and you cap him as he's released from prison in 20 years. Pre-meditated or not that isn't the kind of case I am referring to. As long as you're damn sure you have the right perp.
11C2P '83-'87
Airborne Infantry
F**k China!
Methodically walking and shooting people. Sound familiar? Another prescription drugged out kid it would seem.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Just need a cop willing to shitcan his LE career and face real jail time and we are all set.
While I'm all for decisively engaging an active threat, I don't think you understand the primary purpose of law enforcement. Cops who are not directly engaged don't get to decide "outcome" and I don't think you'd want to live in the country where they were officially encouraged to do so.
Sadly criminals tend to know the rules better than most people, just the way of the world. Shitbags game the system and mostly innocent people aka "first time **** ups" keep trying to explain what happened over and over until they give somebody everything they need to arrest them.
It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.
Chuck, we miss ya man.
كافر
Dang...listening to the DA, the parents are in deep poo & played a big role in this unfolding.
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass."
Japanese Admiral Yamamoto, 1941
"A wise man's heart directs him toward the right, but a foolish man's heart directs him toward the left."
Ecclesiastes 10:2:
I understand the sentiment in doing bad things to bad people, I can definitely raise some eye brows with a few of my own suggestions. However I think it's probably helpful to LE and potential victims if the shooter is given the opportunity to give up, if or when reality sets in on them. If you face the shooter with imminent death no matter what, then there is no incentive for them to stop shooting, and it's probably of foremost importance to get them to stop shooting.
Sent from my BE2028 using Tapatalk
Bookmarks