Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 39

Thread: Was thinking of going 6.5 Grendel for SBR but now I'm not sure...

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    559
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by 454308 View Post
    Same concept as 300 blkout but uses 6.8mm bullets.

    Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
    I see that but bigger is better so long as it stays above 2200fps IMO. So I'm trying to see what makes the 6.8mm better than 30cal.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    154
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    10" barrel 300 blackout with 110gr gets 2250. 10 in wolvering get 90gr gold dot 2500 and speer tnt at 2600. Energy is close between the 2 I just wasn't impressed with a short barrel blackout on deer and hogs. I've got no complaints with the wolverine thus far.

    Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    559
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by 454308 View Post
    10" barrel 300 blackout with 110gr gets 2250. 10 in wolvering get 90gr gold dot 2500 and speer tnt at 2600. Energy is close between the 2 I just wasn't impressed with a short barrel blackout on deer and hogs. I've got no complaints with the wolverine thus far.

    Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
    2500 is smoking out of a 10"!!!! Holy crap

    What is the penetration like with the 90gr though? The cartridge I had in mind was the 308 110gr Varmageddon and it basically exploded on impact but also traveled to about 12" or so. I have no doubt 90gr at 2500 would explode more but penetration..?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    559
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    The more I'm reading the more 6.8 spc makes the most sense.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    154
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Out of the wolverine broke front shoulder and destroyed heart, bullet lodged in offside at 50 yards on 100lb doe

    Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Posts
    883
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    Unless you reload, ammo availability should also play a factor. Just changed an AR pistol from .223 to 300 BO since I have a bunch of 30 cal bullets sitting around and 223 brass. Also have some suppressors on order so there is that to consider. I have used grendel to hunt with and most of my kills were with hornady 123 gr amaxs but I have some 90 gr varmint nosler bullets to try. No grendel in short barrel but a 16" and 20". The 20 was a beast to lug around so built a 16" Alexander Arms LW barrel builders kit. Works good for a woods gun.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    559
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by joedirt199 View Post
    Unless you reload, ammo availability should also play a factor. Just changed an AR pistol from .223 to 300 BO since I have a bunch of 30 cal bullets sitting around and 223 brass. Also have some suppressors on order so there is that to consider. I have used grendel to hunt with and most of my kills were with hornady 123 gr amaxs but I have some 90 gr varmint nosler bullets to try. No grendel in short barrel but a 16" and 20". The 20 was a beast to lug around so built a 16" Alexander Arms LW barrel builders kit. Works good for a woods gun.
    I have a huge reloading setup so that isn't an issue. Even mold some of my own bullets for other calibers.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    2,868
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Stopsign32v View Post
    But I don't care much for long range. Just looking for a 10" or so barrel that has a little more "stopping power" than a little .223

    Looks like 300blk super is still the answer for me maybe. Though the 6.5 Grendel in 10" did have me curious.
    Long range is the niche of the 6.5 Grendel. There is a 6.5 Grendel load that is supposed to get 2500 fps with a 100 grain bullet from a 10.5" barrel, posted by Bill Alexander himself, but it uses an OTM bullet.

    .300 BLK is weak by comparison to .300 HAM'R which is yielding 2300fps with 130gr and 135gr bullets from a 11.3" barrel.

    https://texashuntingforum.com/forum/...opics/7506626/


  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    559
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Disciple View Post
    .300 BLK is weak by comparison to .300 HAM'R which is yielding 2300fps with 130gr and 135gr bullets from a 11.3" barrel.
    300 HAM'R? Again, another I've never heard of. I'm amazed at all of the wild card cartridges that have come out.


    Edit: Now I'd love to see how the 300 HAM'R compares to the 277 Wolverine! 30cal 110gr out of the blackout was around 2200-2300fps out of a 10" I believe so I'd be curious what the 300 HAM'R would take that same bullet to.
    Last edited by Stopsign32v; 12-29-21 at 13:12.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Lowcountry, SC.
    Posts
    6,239
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Stopsign32v View Post
    But I don't care much for long range. Just looking for a 10" or so barrel
    Have you considered 5.56?????

    Grendel’s not dead. Its a good cartridge.
    RLTW

    “What’s New” button, but without GD: https://www.m4carbine.net/search.php...new&exclude=60 , courtesy of ST911.

    Disclosure: I am affiliated PRN with a tactical training center, but I speak only for myself. I have no idea what we sell, other than CLP and training. I receive no income from sale of hard goods.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •