Originally Posted by
WillBrink
Would it also be correct to say that "Seeing the high rate of failure of typical pistol loads during that 18 months really soured me"
That is, that all standard pistol loads in typical duty loads are poor man stoppers in general. So, if we know all typical duty loads are already poor man stoppers, why on earth would you make your chances of success even lower for the convenience of a slightly smaller pistol with .380?
If that's all you can CCW, then it is what it is and you make the best of it, but that's not what we are really talking about here for most. Fact is, if you can conceal a .380 you can conceal a slightly larger 9mm, and we all know it.
Maybe the Underwood stuff changes the equation slightly, and perhaps .380 is a good choice for a BUG (but some PDs ban them as such due to how poorly they perform...), but it's just asking for being behind the survival curve when you don't need to be.
My own story is way less dramatic than yours: first pistol I ever got was a S&W .380. It was cheap and I figured good enough. Buddy of mine, a LEO in a gang unit in major city PD, gets into OIS, and puts 5 rnds of .40 into a guy, who simply dropped his own gun and ran off. Guy was later found in an ER and lived.
My buddy said he'd thought he'd missed due to what was a no visual indicators he'd shot the guy at all. No jerking around like the movies, no blood, nadda. That was his first of several and it freaked him out. I also came to learn that's surprisingly common among LEOs who have had such experiences. That was the first and last .380 I ever owned. We have no lack of confirmed stories of people absorbing double digits of 9mm, .40. .45, 45, and continuing to fight and not until someone with a long gun shows up and puts the goblin down, do they stop fighting.
And people wanna carry a .380 with a limited capacity to boot? Good luck wit that...
Bookmarks