The worst I am aware of from a western nation, is Australia. People are involuntarily put in the camps to quarantine. If you refuse, they will call the police, and you will be put there against your will, so while it may sound a bit melodramatic to call them "Internement Camps" it's not totally off base either.

I posted vid from new source that attempts to make it sound acceptable:



One person's actual experience I found interesting, among others, and it's disturbing to me:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGFdWcJU7-0&t=1s

And would such a thing happen in the US? "On paper" they already exist, suvh as WAC 246-100-040
"Procedures for isolation or quarantine." Note, that's from 2003, but does give the state government from sweeping powers. I'm not an attorney, but it seems to my reading, they can put a person in such involuntarily. In fact, it looks like they could take an entire family. That's not some Alex Jones conspiracy BS either, that's direct from WA state legislation.

https://app.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.a...te=246-100-040

I'm not really surprised that state and fed docs exist that under extremis circumstances, they can quarantine you against your will, and I don't think it's a leap to assume they have at least considered the idea. I also think they know that it would play badly with most of the 'Murican public, and could get real ugly real fast. Finally, I give you CDC ideas for "Shielding Approach" to such camps. From what I can ascertain, they are voluntary, and if so, could be of value is circumstances warranted it, but I also have little doubt under the right circumstances the voluntary part could change quickly, and that does not give me the warm and fuzzies at all:

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...anitarian.html