Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 62

Thread: Hospital sues at will employess attempting to quit

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    9,564
    Feedback Score
    45 (100%)
    Counter sue their asses for lawyer fees, lost wages and mental trauma.
    Gettin' down innagrass.
    Let's Go Brandon!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,835
    Feedback Score
    0
    Yeah the temporary injunction doesn't make them go back to work at the whining hospital, it just prevents them from starting at the new place until the case is heard.

    "Poaching" employees isn't anything new, but has usually been associated with non-medical fields. Now it has crossed over and someone doesn't like it. Oh well.

    One would think that the new hospital might provide some legal aid but they are probably washing their hands of it as that could get costly.
    Last edited by ABNAK; 01-23-22 at 17:54.
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    1,528
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ABNAK View Post
    Yeah the temporary injunction doesn't make them go back to work at the whining hospital, it just prevents them from starting at the new place until the case is heard.

    "Poaching" employees isn't anything new, but has usually been associated with non-medical fields. Now it has crossed over and someone doesn't like it. Oh well.

    One would think that the new hospital might provide some legal aid but they are probably washing their hands of it as that could get costly.
    Or take this to the next logical conclusion, both hospitals were in on it. They agreed to this plan of action to set a precedent of one hospital not being able to hire another hospitals employees, because their is such a shortage of staff, and not just in hospitals but in every business right now. That they set this up, to basically enslave hospital staff. After what we have witnessed hospitals do over the last two years, the horrific atrocities they have committed in the name of “covid” it is not a hard jump for me to think they would pull something like this on their workers.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    718
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    how the fk can this happen?

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,835
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by RUTGERS95 View Post
    how the fk can this happen?
    Well it hasn't yet happened officially. This is an order to essentially cease and desist until tomorrow when the arguments will be heard in court. I wouldn't think that would be a pipedream in Amerika but it is 2022 after all.....
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    2,767
    Feedback Score
    0
    I'd call in sick.

    ETA: FOREVER!
    Last edited by utahjeepr; 01-23-22 at 22:15.
    Go Ukraine! Piss on the Russian dead.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,852
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ABNAK View Post
    Well it hasn't yet happened officially. This is an order to essentially cease and desist until tomorrow when the arguments will be heard in court. I wouldn't think that would be a pipedream in Amerika but it is 2022 after all.....
    Based on the details so far(and those seem consistent from source to source) that a US judge approached with "they won't work for us for what we want to pay so we don't want them working any where" didn't at least respond with "GTFO here" seems to be an indicator of a very deep rooted problem.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,458
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by jsbhike View Post
    Based on the details so far(and those seem consistent from source to source) that a US judge approached with "they won't work for us for what we want to pay so we don't want them working any where" didn't at least respond with "GTFO here" seems to be an indicator of a very deep rooted problem.
    How long have we known that this country was suffering from a black-robed asscancer from SCOTUS all the way down?
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    Ye best start believin' in Orwellian Dystopias, mateys... yer LIVIN' in one!--after Capt. Hector Barbossa
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    33,988
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ABNAK View Post
    Yeah the temporary injunction doesn't make them go back to work at the whining hospital, it just prevents them from starting at the new place until the case is heard.

    "Poaching" employees isn't anything new, but has usually been associated with non-medical fields. Now it has crossed over and someone doesn't like it. Oh well.

    One would think that the new hospital might provide some legal aid but they are probably washing their hands of it as that could get costly.
    It's only poaching if there is an employment contract, otherwise these are free agents / free citizens and this is 100% BS. Hospital A is simply trying to keep costs low, they could have retained these employees by matching offers, other incentives, etc. Instead they decided to not be competitive...BUT....they have money for lawyers.

    If they get away with this, teachers and first responders will be the next ones to be declared "essential workers" and lose their rights.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,424
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by jsbhike View Post
    Based on the details so far(and those seem consistent from source to source) that a US judge approached with "they won't work for us for what we want to pay so we don't want them working any where" didn't at least respond with "GTFO here" seems to be an indicator of a very deep rooted problem.
    I could look at what the judge did and see it in the light of “Will the adults in the room please keep patient care going and figure something out..” and if they don’t he’ll have to rule against hospital A, or at least make the eventual loss so damaging that senior management at Hospital A culls the idiots behind this.

    Everyone in that market has to be looking at Hospital A and wondering WTF.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •