Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 53

Thread: Erratic Ejection Pattern

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    339
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by markm View Post
    Two things.

    1. Overgassing won't cause head swipes, so no surprise there. and

    2. Do you happen to have one of those God Damned Retarded Springco buffer springs? I tried one of those once and totally effed up a decent running carbine.

    last possibility is there's a poorly button rifled barrel that's got tight or overbore spots.. and it just needs to be replaced. pin gauging the bore would tell you if that is possibly and issue.
    Agreed, sprinco is all SOTAR hype.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Posts
    40
    Feedback Score
    0
    I’m surprised to see the dislike for Sprinco extractor springs. I have one in all of my Bolts and have had nothing but great results from them.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    36
    Feedback Score
    0
    Mid-length, .093, lots of bolt-over-base, ..........bolt bounce from hell ?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Martinez GA
    Posts
    73
    Feedback Score
    0
    Might check and make sure the hammer in the lower can be pushed down as far as the carrier pushes it on cocking without binding between it and the trigger. Also would check that the hammer can push past the disconnector with the trigger pulled without binding. Odd but if there was binding on cocking it might slow or partial restrict the carrier's movement.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2021
    Posts
    142
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by curious1 View Post
    Might check and make sure the hammer in the lower can be pushed down as far as the carrier pushes it on cocking without binding between it and the trigger. Also would check that the hammer can push past the disconnector with the trigger pulled without binding. Odd but if there was binding on cocking it might slow or partial restrict the carrier's movement.
    I thought the same thing, that it might be the hammer or even a bent buffer tube slowing the BCG. But I swapped lowers with my friend's midlenth upper and my upper still acted funny & my lower ran her upper fine. My upper runs good on a rifle lower, 3:00 ejection 7 feet. It only ejects about 3 feet in a downward angle at 1:30 to 4:00 on a carbine lower with a 4oz or 3oz buffer, also a 3.8 oz buffer . I am gonna try a H3 or heavier buffer soon. But it seems reliable with the rifle length & weight buffer system. I can't understand why the ejection is so erratic & unreliable with the carbine lowers.
    Last edited by JoeBobJoe; 04-21-22 at 18:13.
    God, Family, Freedom.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Midland, Georgia
    Posts
    2,063
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    First, mid-length should have helped by dropping port pressure. You opened up the gas port and went to over-gassing.

    If it works with a rifle lower and buffer you can try one of Clint's HSS or XH buffers. A T2 using tungsten powder, shot, or dust does not necessarily have the same dead-blow action as solid weights sliding back-and-forth.

    Bottom line though, if it's feeding, cycling, ejecting empties overboard, and locking the bolt to the rear on an empty magazine WHO GIVES A FLYING RICARDO where the brass goes? Why is that important?!

    If brass goes ANYWHERE from 12 to 3 the "Brass deflector hump" where a lefty doesn't constantly get hot empties in his kisser is doing its job.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Always in the mountains.
    Posts
    668
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    From a practical perspect, that upper is toast. Having a barrel with a 0.93” gas port is going to induce further problems down the line. I would ditch the entire thing and save yourself further headache.

    Chalk it up to experience, buy a BCM/Sionics/LMT, and if something goes wrong with it, send it back to the factory.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Midland, Georgia
    Posts
    2,063
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyohte View Post
    From a practical perspect, that upper is toast. Having a barrel with a 0.93” gas port is going to induce further problems down the line. I would ditch the entire thing and save yourself further headache.

    Chalk it up to experience ...
    It sounds like it needs a new barrel at the least.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,433
    Feedback Score
    0
    Out of the experiments, did you run another carbine buffer lower? You said it works on a rifle buffer tube lower, and you’ve tried different weight buffers on your carbine set-up, but I didn’t hear if you tried a different carbine set up lower. Just ‘filling out’ the matrix
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    77
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    try swapping receiver extensions on the lowers. it only takes a few minutes.

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •